The late US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia had become not only a critic of the decisions that the liberal wing of the Supreme Court made, but a critic of the Supreme Court itself, calling the institution a “threat to American democracy.”
He also went so far as to support what is often referred to as a “conspiracy theory,” that FEMA camps are being established for the purpose of the detention of Americans, stating that Americans were “kidding themselves” if they didn’t believe that the camps and their nefarious purposes exist.
Clearly this talk was not coming from someone on the fringe of society, but from a man who was at the pinnacle of his profession — a US Supreme Court justice, no less. So when he made comments like these , it was not possible for opponents to write what he said off as the ravings of someone on the lunatic fringe. Scalia, by his position and stature, demanded attention, forcing his statements into the national discourse while offering support for ideas those on the left want hidden from the public.
His comments undoubtedly made him a lot of enemies on the left. Although it’s not a path we like to go down, given recent leaked emails, we have to think the unthinkable: Was a US Supreme Court justice assassinated because he had become a danger to those on the left and their agenda? That’s a very serious charge, and it demands a serious investigation and a discussion of what we now know. Something we will do on page two.
Wow…and when will they be put in jail
Debbie Lisi …You can copy all here !! ——Five Clinton-Russia Bombshells Progressives Yawned Over
by Jerome Hudson4 Mar 2017
Given the establishment media’s focus on the “scandal” surrounding President Donald Trump and his administration’s contact with Russian officials, it is worth reminding Americans of the revelations involving Hillary Clinton and the Kremlin.
1. Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia and nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.
While Hillary Clinton’s State Department was one of eight agencies to review and sign off on the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia — then-Secretary of State Clinton herself was the only agency head whose family foundation received $145 million in donations from multiple people connected to the uranium deal, as reported by the New York Times.
2. Bill Clinton bagged $500,000 for a Moscow speech paid for by a Kremlin-backed bank while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
Former President Bill Clinton delivered a speech in Moscow and received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian government-connected bank, while his wife’s State Department was getting ready to sign off on the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia.
“And, in one case, a Russian investment bank connected to the deals paid money to Bill Clinton personally, through a half-million-dollar speaker’s fee,” reported the New Yorker.
3. Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman’s Joule energy company bagged $35 million from Putin’s Rusnano.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the executive board of an energy company, Joule Unlimited, which r eceived millions from a Putin-connected Russian government fund. Podesta also owned “75,000 common shares” in Joule Unlimited, which he had transferred to a holding company called Leonidio LLC.
Podesta also failed to fully disclose his position on Joule Unlimited’s board of directors and include it in his federal financial disclosures, as required by law, before he became President Obama’s senior adviser in January 2014.
4. Clinton Foundation chatter with State Dept. on Uranium Deal with Russia.
Senior staffers inside Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign were warned by Clinton Foundation senior vice president Maura Pally that the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), was asking the Department of Justice to investigate the State Department approval of the sale of American uranium assets to a Russian company.
The chain of emails proved the regular interaction between members of the Clinton campaign and senior staff at the Clinton Foundation.
5. Hillary Clinton hid $2.35 million in secret donations from Ian Telfer, the head of Russia’s uranium company.
Ian Telfer, the head of the Russian government’s uranium company, Uranium One, made four foreign donations totaling $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation, as the New York Times reported.
“Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million,” the Times reported. “Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.”
Follow Jerome Hudson on Twitter @jeromeehudson.
Debbie Lisi …..Hillary Clinton /Uranium/John Podesta/Tony Podesta
Podesta Group’s CEO, Kimberley Fritts, said that “our outside counsel simply informed the [Foreign Agents Registration Unit] that they had been hired to conduct a review into whether we were misled by the Centre for a Modern Ukraine – the same information the firm already publicly announced two weeks ago.”
The Podesta Group managed a second Russian account, i.e. Uranium One, a Russian atomic energy company that secured oil rights in Kazakhstan and the United States through direct collaboration with the Clintons (Related: These Are The Two Companies That Could Land Hillary Clinton In Hot Water). The Russian company funneled tens of millions to the Clinton Foundation and in return received legitimate government benefits.
Uranium One paid the Podesta Group some “$40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service, and the National Security Council,” for mining rights, the Daily Caller reports.
The investigation is ongoing. Experts note the move by the federal government to investigate Podesta Group could open the floodgates for review of other lobbying groups.
I wouldn’t be a bit surprised
Debbie Lisi ….Panama Papers Reveal Clinton’s Kremlin Connection
John and Tony Podesta aren’t fooling anyone
By John R. Schindler • 04/07/16
The revelations of the so-called Panama Papers that are roiling the world’s political and financial elites this week include important facts about Team Clinton. This unprecedented trove of documents purloined from a shady Panama law firm that arranged tax havens, and perhaps money laundering, for the globe’s super-rich includes juicy insights into how Russia’s elite hides its ill-gotten wealth.
Almost lost among the many revelations is the fact that Russia’s biggest bank uses The Podesta Group as its lobbyist in Washington, D.C. Though hardly a household name, this firm is well known inside the Beltway, not least because its CEO is Tony Podesta, one of the best-connected Democratic machers in the country. He founded the firm in 1998 with his brother John, formerly chief of staff to President Bill Clinton, then counselor to President Barack Obama, Mr. Podesta is the very definition of a Democratic insider. Outsiders engage the Podestas and their well-connected lobbying firm to improve their image and get access to Democratic bigwigs.
Which is exactly what Sberbank, Russia’s biggest financial institution, did this spring. As reported at the end of March, the Podesta Group registered with the U.S. Government as a lobbyist for Sberbank, as required by law, naming three Podesta Group staffers: Tony Podesta plus Stephen Rademaker and David Adams, the last two former assistant secretaries of state. It should be noted that Tony Podesta is a big-money bundler for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign while his brother John is the chairman of that campaign, the chief architect of her plans to take the White House this November.
Sberbank (Savings Bank in Russian) engaged the Podesta Group to help its public image—leading Moscow financial institutions not exactly being known for their propriety and wholesomeness—and specifically to help lift some of the pain of sanctions placed on Russia in the aftermath of the Kremlin’s aggression against Ukraine, which has caused real pain to the country’s hard-hit financial sector.
It’s hardly surprising that Sberbank sought the help of Democratic insiders like the Podesta Group to aid them in this difficult hour, since they clearly understand how American politics work. The question is why the Podesta Group took Sberbank’s money. That financial institution isn’t exactly hiding in the shadows—it’s the biggest bank in Russia, and its reputation leaves a lot to be desired. Nobody acquainted with Russian finance was surprised that Sberbank wound up in the Panama Papers.
Since the brothers are destined for very high-level jobs if the Democrats triumph in November, their relationship is something they—and Clinton—need to explain.
Although Sberbank has its origins in the nineteenth century, it was functionally reborn after the Soviet collapse, and it the 1990s it grew to be the dominant bank in the country, today controlling nearly 30 percent of Russia’s aggregate banking assets and employing a quarter-million people. The majority stockholder in Sberbank is Russia’s Central Bank. In other words, Sberbank is functionally an arm of the Kremlin, although it’s ostensibly a private institution.
Certainly Western intelligence is well acquainted with Sberbank, noting its close relationship with Vladimir Putin and his regime. Funds moving through Sberbank are regularly used to support clandestine Russian intelligence operations, while the bank uses its offices abroad as cover for the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service or SVR. A NATO counterintelligence official explained that Sberbank, which has outposts in almost two dozen foreign countries, “functions as a sort of arm of the SVR outside Russia, especially because many of its senior employees are ‘former’ Russian intelligence officers.” Inside the country, Sberbank has an equally cosy relationship with the Federal Security Service or FSB, Russia’s powerful domestic intelligence agency.
Ukraine has pointed a finger at Sberbank as an instrument of Russia’s aggression against their country. In 2014, Ukraine’s Security Service charged Sberbank with “financing terrorism,” noting that its branches were distributing millions of dollars in illegal aid to Russian-backed separatists fighting in eastern Ukraine. Kyiv’s conclusion, that Sberbank is a witting supporter of Russian aggression against Ukraine, is broadly supported by Western intelligence. “Sberbank is the Kremlin, they don’t do anything major without Putin’s go-ahead, and they don’t tell him ‘no’ either,” explained a retired senior U.S. intelligence official with extensive experience in Eastern Europe.
In addition, Ukrainian intelligence has alleged that the FSB collaborated with Sberbank in the bombings of two of the bank’s branches in Kyiv, Ukraine’s
capital, in June 2015. The attacks caused no casualties but got major coverage in Russian state media as “proof” of Ukraine’s instability and violent anti-Russian nature. Although the notion that Russian spies would plant bombs as a provocation, what the Kremlin terms provokatsiya, may sound outlandish to those unacquainted with espionage, in fact Russian spies have been doing such things since tsarist times. What I’ve termed “f**e terrorism” is a longstanding Kremlin core competency, and it can only be pulled off with logistical support, including with finances.
Predictably, Sberbank has blown off the Panama Papers revelations as nothing of consequence, but the fact that they are an arm of the Kremlin and they do plenty of shady things in many countries is a matter of record. As is the fact that the Podesta Group is their lobbyist in America.
Among the Sberbank subsidiaries that the Podesta Group also represents are the Cayman Islands-based Troika Dialog Group Limited, the Cyprus-based SBGB Cyprus Limited, and the Luxembourg-based SB International. As reported this week by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a consortium of journalists exploring the Panama Papers leak, Sberbank and Troika Dialog are used by members of Mr. Putin’s inner circle to shift public funds into sometimes questionable private investments. In other words, this is top-level money laundering of a brazen kind. As the OCCRP stated plainly, “Some of these companies were initially connected to the Troika Dialog investment fund, which was controlled and run by Sberbank after the bank bought the Troika Dialog investment bank. Troika and Sberbank declined to comment.”
Adding to shadiness of all this, the Podesta Group is playing along with the useful charade that Sberbank is simply a private financial institution, rather than the state-owned bank that it is, since that would require the lobbyists to register as agents of the Russian government under the Foreign Agent Registration Act.
John and Tony Podesta aren’t fooling anyone with this ruse. They are lobbyists for Vladimir Putin’s personal bank of choice, an arm of his Kremlin and its intelligence services. Since the brothers Podesta are presumably destined for very high-level White House jobs next January if the Democrats triumph in November at the polls, their relationship with Sberbank is something they—and Hillary Clinton—need to explain to the public.
Debbie Lisi …..THE RISE AND FALL OF HILLARY
by Carl Grant Looney, Ph.D.
Read about Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton and how she went from being a Republican in a small business family in suburban Chicago to prestigious Wellesley College for four years with a lesbian roommate. Next was Yale Law School (as a Democrat after meeting Bill Clinton there). As a radical at Yale she supported and aided the Black Panthers during their trial for tying up and torturing a black member by beating, burning, scalding, freezing, stabbing with an ice pick and finally shooting him (two members she supported spent only 3 and 5 years in prison for that ghastly murder).
From there her tribulations included being fired for ethics violations (preventing due process) while working on the Watergate investigation of Richard Nixon. In Arkansas, she and Bill were involved in the Whitewater scam that fleeced the life savings of many retirees. After Bill Clinton became President of the U.S., she failed the bar examination in D.C. She then wanted to be a NY Senator but John F. Kennedy, Jr. was set to announce for it and was a sure bet to win. Kennedy was then killed in a suspicious small airplane accident and she was elected New York Senator (see last paragraph below).
After serving as a lackluster NY Senator, she became Secretary of State after her presidential loss to Barrack Obama in 2008. As Obama’s U.S. Secretary of State, she ran a pay-for-play scheme by providing costly U.S. governmental favors to foreign governments (e.g., jet fighters to Saudi Arabia and substantial Uranium to Russia) and to individuals whom made significant contributions to the Clinton Foundation owned by Hillary, Bill and daughter Chelsea. That money is now said to be in the billions of dollars in a Canadian bank (tax free and protected by Canadian law from divulging information about it – wait, it has now been moved to a secret location).
Russian payments to the Clinton Foundation were for a 25% stake of American owned Uranium (could be used to nuke major U.S. cities). Another large contribution was from Lebanese entrepreneur Gilbert Chagoury in Nigeria for a project where a dredged up sand island was paid for by the U.S. for a U.S. Embassy, planned under Secretary of State Clinton to be off the Atlantic Coast of Lagos, Nigeria. Atlantic storms will eventually wash it away, at a huge loss to American taxpayers. Gilbert Chagoury, paid a lot of money to the Clinton Foundation for this Quid pro Quo. But only 5.7% of Clinton Foundation money goes to charity (where is the rest of it?). The Clinton Foundation is now accused of supplying cheap ineffective medicines in Africa and daughter Chelsea is said to spend foundation money compulsively.
Hillary now disdains Trump’s call for a wall along the U.S. southern border, but President Clinton built a 325 mile fence along the California-Mexican border in 1993 with Hillary’s “strong” support. In 2006, she voted for H.R. 6061, the Secure Fence Act, to create 700 miles of double-layered fence to prevent crossings by illegal people.
There is critical information included here, such as the growing list of deaths of more than 90 of people with critical information about the Clintons. Hillary swore like a drunken sailor (“f**k you” to White House workers who said, e.g., “good morning” to her). As a presidential candidate with strongly biased support by the media, she expected to win easily but was outsmarted. She lost the electoral college vote despite millions of dead people and millions of illegals voting for her. This book reveals her characteristics and failings (even people who voted for her do not trust her).
Hillary and Bill Clinton wanted Hillary to get the upcoming Senate seat for NY in 2000 as a prelude to her presidency. The NY Times was set to announce Kennedy’s candidacy, but then Kennedy and his pregnant wife died in the mysterious crash of his small airplane during landing on an island off the MA coast. Government personnel kept the site off limits with details hushed up, but their released reports of poor visibility as the cause was a total lie as it was sunny and clear that day. This was typical of the deaths of dozens of persons who had information about the Clintons. This work is a must read for every American citizen. Click the red link above this column for a preview.
When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you – you know your nation is doomed. — Ayn Rand
Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can. — Arthur Ashe
Debbie Lisi ….Why Hillary Clinton lost
#1….45 years of criminal activity / treasonous actions / unethical & illegal law practices( kicked off the Nixon impeachment committee ) & stole / sold White House furniture/paintings !..even though some got taken back from her ! & 35 k e-mails & unethical actions as duty in sect. of state & “NOW ” 59 deaths is why is not in office !….#2…she has never created a law or help get a law passed ! Politically speaking she has really done nothing but fill her/Bills pockets with ill gotten gain $$$ !!!! She is a socialist to the core & follows Alinsky writings & was his close friend & he was her mentor !!! Read below :—> Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” The rest of this is great info & factual & is in this:—> Hillary has been unethical for 43 years starting at the Pres. Richard M. Nixon’s impeachment committee trial…..Gene
Hillary Rodham Clinton History
http://www.eohistory.info/2013/hillaryHistory.htm
Mar 12, 2015 – The Judiciary Committee allowed Douglas to keep counsel, thus …. In addition to getting Hillary a job on the Nixon impeachment inquiry staff, …
Hillary Rodham Clinton History
eohistory.info
Thank you for sharing
Debbie Lisi …..Take this site & use it well !!!! —————————————-************
Hillary D Rodham’s Wellesley College, May 2, 1969 senior thesis
http://www.bookoflife.org/gamma/01/hdr_1969/index.htm
Saul Alinsky was a Luciferian tactician. Anyone who’s read his …. Hillary D Rodham’s WellesleyCollege, May 2, 1969 senior thesis. Hillary Clinton’s Senior …
Podesta..Hills dancing monkey..sigh