Once a nation’s justice system is determined to have different sets of standards for different groups of people, a repudiation of that justice system is not far behind. Principles like “equal protection under the law” go out the window, and a biting cynicism and even contempt for those government officials who purport to enforce the laws sets in.
Such is the case with so many issues surrounding Hillary Clinton that one scarcely knows where to start. That Hillary has broken numerous laws with impunity is obvious to anyone who cares to look. What is turning this into a national disgrace is the blatant corruption of the legal process that allows her to continue on in her quest to be president while anyone else would be under prosecution.
It’s back to the email scandal and the failure of the FBI to do its job on page two.
Next time you’re at the law library, look up the emoluments clause in the Constitution. And then post that$#%&!@*everywhere.
You either pulled that straight out of your$#%&!@* or it explains exactly what happened and you just exposed more top secret$#%&!@*than Hillary’s e mails ever did… Just saying.
Bring this traitor to justice and lock her up with everyone involved in her corrupt circle of criminals !
The US Government is the best example of organized crime the world has ever seen. I thought Ancient Rome had us beat but they surprise me everyday.
Hope all in office now takes heed The people have spoken and will be watching Clinton should be prosecuted. Your future may depend on your actions
Actually Bob the last part was added by Congress and since it wasn’t an actual Amendment to the Constitution and it didn’t go through the ratification process an actual Amendment does it has no force of law behind it. I agree she shouldn’t hold any office again but the law isn’t as clear as your claiming it to be.
Anthony Brothers, the law is clear; however, the interpretation, as to whether or not unconstitutional, is not!
“The Constitution does expressly allow Congress to make disqualification from future office part of the sentence in impeachment proceedings — but has no such provision as to criminal sentences.”
As Article II Section IV of the United States Constitution, states clearly, “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Therefore, the Argument–if those factors, outlined in Article II Section IV of the United States Constitution, would disqualify a sitting president, then why wouldn’t those same factors disqualify a presidential candidate?
Furthermore, the alleged felony criminal infractions were committed by the current presidential candidate while that candidate held a federal government office, and if convicted, would certainly result in his/her removal from office and likely imprisoned.
Do NOT like-but more corruption than we ever could have imagined!
Bob Seniah Actually do a little research and you’ll find it isn’t legally enforceable.
Anthony Brothers, of course, I research plenty, do you think I’m making this up as I go? Utterly ridiculous on your part!
Impeachment is limited to the office of the president, as clearly outlined in Article II Section IV of the United States Constitution.
The secretary of state is a civil officer, and therefore, subject to the impeachment process.