Report: Swedish Man Arrested for ‘Offensive’ Food Choice

A 53-year-old man in Stockholm was convicted by authorities this week for eating bacon near Muslim women.

The Islamic women reported him to the police for eating bacon in front of them. The man allegedly sat near the veiled Muslim women and began eating his bacon and being obnoxious with it in a taunting way toward the women.

The report states that the Muslim women were uncomfortable with the situation and attempted to move somewhere else, that dastardly bacon-eating fiend followed the women with his pork product. The man also apparently said some not-so-nice things about the women’s religion.

Now to be clear, the man shouldn’t have been acting obnoxious. But, people sometimes acting obnoxious is just a part of life. It is ridiculous to think people have the right to demand someone be punished for eating bacon in an obnoxious manner.

Would you be offended if someone eat lettuce near you in an obnoxious manner? No. He would just be a guy obnoxiously eating lettuce and walking near you on the street. End of story.

This case is uniquely Muslim. The whole reason this man got in trouble is because pork products are offensive to Muslims, just like dogs. And the law now favors Muslim culture over Western culture and enlightenment.

Why do you think that is?

Another source claims that the man didn’t just eat the bacon, but held it close their faces and demanded the Muslims partake of the yummy breakfast food as well:

A story making headlines in some media outlets claims that a man was convicted in Sweden for ‘eating bacon’ in front of women wearing veils. But the reality is that the man was charged after insulting them on the grounds of their ethnicity and religion.

The incident, which happened on a commuter train to Stockholm suburb Märsta in 2015, saw a 52-year-old man walk up to a group of three women who were wearing veils, then hold bacon in front of their face and demand that they should eat it.

When the three women changed to different seats, the man followed them. He also said he “hates muslims”. Attunda District Court judged that the man’s intention was to insult the three passengers on the grounds of their ethnic origin and creed.

According to the court’s judgement, which The Local has seen, the man “held bacon up to their faces, demanded that they eat it, then ate it in front of them. From CCTV evidence from the train it is clear that there was ample seating space in other parts of the train. Despite that, he followed the plaintiffs when they changed place in order to avoid him, and facing them, which is made clear by the CCTV film, continued to eat bacon in front of them”.

“At this stage, he stated to the plaintiffs that he ‘hates Muslims’. The district court considers his actions make it clear that the purpose was to insult the plaintiffs because of their ethnic origin and creed,” the document continues.

And his fine?

Evidence from CCTV footage, witness statements and accounts provided by the three women was used in the case. The man was ordered to pay damages of 5,000 kronor to each of the women, as well as 60 “day-fines” – a type of fine based on the offender’s income.

5,000 kronor translates to $628.25.

This isn’t the 1st time European Muslims have forced law enforcement to enforce sharia law. A small restaurant owner, Graham Web-Lee, also had to go to court and face charges because the smell of bacon emerging from the restaurant offended Muslims walking by. Sharia law (banning pork) is now a part of leftist Western countries!

Source: Gateway Pundit, The Local





Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest