In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
what???????????
Isn’t she there to see the cons$#%&!@*ution is upheld?
I THINK EVERYBODY BETTER READ THE CONS$#%&!@*UTION ,IT SEEMS NOBODY KNOWS WHAT IT IS AND WHAT IT MEANS
FIRE THE $#%&!@*ING JUDGE
DISBAR HER NOW!!!!!
You are to uphold the cons$#%&!@*ution idiot; that is why you took the oath. How dare you not mention the cons$#%&!@*ution in your court.
This $#%&!@* needs the taste slapped out of her mouth!
Disbar the judge!!
She needs to be fired It’s our laws. You are a judge. Wtf. Get her out she is dangerous
That’s uncons$#%&!@*utional!