In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Disbarred her
Than that court is not part of the union thus all proceedings are voided
Isn’t that what the courts are supposed to be for !
This “Ohio Judge” just lost the right to wear the robe or sit in an American courtroom. It’s a crime for a public servant to violate the Cons$#%&!@*ution. This is pretty blatant. First amendment, anyone? “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to $#%&!@*emble, and to pe$#%&!@*ion the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Sorry but the cons$#%&!@*ution supersedes the judge. She can ban it as much as she likes, but she has no power to do so.
She is in OBama pocket
All law enforcer r above the law until we stand up together an arrest them r selfves that in the cons$#%&!@*utional way
RECALL THIS JUDGE.
id be in contempt
What is wrong with people?? A judge that is suppose to uphold the law is breaking it? Horrible!!