If the events of the past few months are anything to go by, we are looking at what might very well be a replay of the 1960’s in 21st century America.
During that turbulent decade, the left, disgusted with it perceived as the evil of the American political system, rose up in anger and proceeded to cause chaos across the nation. College students joined with radical activists to disrupt events and demonstrate against the corruption they saw around themselves. Not simply content to protest the “evils” of their country, some of these agitators used violent tactics in the misguided belief that it would advance their extreme agendas.
Today, it seems like liberals are trying to revive these tactics in order to undermine the presidency of Donald Trump. We have seen protests that disrupt the day-to-day lives of Americans, riots that endanger the safety of others, and public figures shouted down for expressing views that differ from their own.
Read more on the next page:
disruption is not protest its a riot,arrest them and give them 10 years to think about it
Lol. Silly.
These prop l e are being paid to attend town hall meetings and disrupt things. Making it seem like everyone is against the same thing.
Start carding these town halls . If their not in your district boot them out
Democrats Losing with No Dignity & No Class! It will be many many many many many many many many many many many many many many many many years before the Democrats win a Presidential election after all this nonsense!
Vilification, ad hominem attacks, demeaning “laughter”, inability to address the issues or argue rationally, ignorance of those issues, acceptance of the wildest lies – these are all tactics used by those attempting to explain away the protesters and demonstrators standing up for their most dearly held beliefs. This is not an effective means of arguing your point. The person claiming the demonstrators were paid is beyond talking to, as is the one who seems to believe a riot occurred at the Chaffetz town hall, because they clearly don’t understand the concept of fact-checking. But none of these arguments can be taken seriously because there is no evidence or substance presented with them. These are tactics used only by those who can’t argue the issues and who are so sheltered that they actually believe nobody could possibly disagree legitimately with their world view. In case you missed the point – HOW DARE YOU ASSUME THAT THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH YOU ARE NOT JUST AS LEGITIMATE AND PASSIONATE IN THEIR BELIEFS AS YOU ARE.