Hillary loves her gun-toting secret service men, who have protected her for decades, yet she believes everyday Americans don’t deserve the right to protect themselves, via gun ownership.
In her flawed opinion, Americans must be disarmed because “terrorists use guns to kill Americans.” She also believes gun manufactures should be sued by the victims of gun violence and that a national gun tax, much like a sin tax, will bring down gun violence. She is by definition insane: extremely foolish or irrational.
She has pulled out her big guns to war against gun ownership in six-part platform, a plan to “incrementally disarm America”. Clinton has used victims of violence as her poster people for her anti-gun agenda. With each tragedy, progressives punish law abiding citizens for crimes they did not commit. After the Umpqua Community College shooting, Clinton used this to gain media attention and press her plan to allow victims and families to sue gun manufacturers, because suing the maker of an object brings healing and justice.
Duke University researcher Chris Conover has demonstrated that owning a car is “80 percent” more dangerous than owning a gun–as relates to the lives of others–Clinton said nothing about allowing crash victims and their families to sue Ford, Chevrolet, Toyota, or Mercedes. Point Made, wrote Truth and Action.
Clinton asked, “What is wrong with us that we can’t stand up to the NRA and the gun lobby and the gun manufacturers they represent?” She is pledging to fight for these new controls and laws as president. Anything to take the focus off her deepening quagmire.
Her six-part plan includes this notion that suing a gun manufacturer stops the violence. Read more on the next page and be prepared to wage the intellectual battle to protect your gun rights.