Last year, the massive influx of Middle Eastern asylum seekers was a leading news story. Western nations were stunned not only by the near-instantaneous swelling of their countries’ foreign population, but by the chaos that seemed to come with the so-called “refugees.”
Leftist politicians tried to spin their countries’ acceptance as a humanitarian necessity. Without asylum, it was argued that these individuals would be homeless — and maybe even dead from war. This sudden urge to take care of fellow man was no doubt surprising to many, as citizens pointed to their own countrymen in need and asked why they weren’t assisted with such urgent passion.
Of course, liberals shrugged this argument off. “We can help both,” they would argue. Unfortunately, that couldn’t have been farther from the truth. In fact, given the choice between helping their own or helping foreign migrants, politicians have shown time and time again that the migrants take precedence.
One family learned that the hard way when they were told to leave their home in order to make way for a new foreign family. See that story on the next page:
Very possible. It can take a lifetime to be allowed*** to own a house there
This$#%&!@*is coming to America soon…
You must love your socialist Swedish gov now.
Sweden? Isn’t that one of those Scandinavian Socialist Utopias we keep hearing so dang much about?
I would burn it to the ground.
if it was done to me it would be war and I would burn down the governments house with them still in it
They should have burned the house down with the Muslims in it.
Coming soon to a theater near you !
Sweden, deport muslim’s take care of your people first.
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.