The U.S. Supreme Court has just green-lit law enforcement officers to enter American homes without a warrant.
At least there was some dissent; Justice Alito wrote about the 6-3 decision that, “When occupants of a residence disagree on whether they will admit police without a warrant, the objecting occupant must be physically present. That doesn’t change if police have removed the objector…”
Just turn that over in your mind for a moment and you can start to see how truly dangerous a precedent that is!
Read page 2 for background on the case and ruling:
We don’t support the partiot act or spying on citizens.. That was done without any of our concent. And we are against that.
They Can Try…..Way different ball game in a rural area.
Our government continues to whittle away at our rights. “shall not be infringed” or “shall not be violated” mean nothing to these morons.
This is old news. If you have a couple in a residence, one says come in the other says stay out, this ruling applies.
They did this with the bombers. No one batted an eye. O please good government save me. And yet it was an old man that found the guy. Where they have already swept.
The supreme court had acted outside if jurisdiction and has committed treason, once again…
they are not defending the constitution, for which they swore an oath…
They are now impersonating public officials and should be arrested immediately…
Oath keepers, step up…
Did anyone read the article? He was the suspect of a robbery? If he robbed you, you all would feel differently about this…
There is a higher court that says they do need a warrant.
You will be assumed as a intruder and delt with as such
Remember that next election. Libs = totalitarian.