Once a nation’s justice system is determined to have different sets of standards for different groups of people, a repudiation of that justice system is not far behind. Principles like “equal protection under the law” go out the window, and a biting cynicism and even contempt for those government officials who purport to enforce the laws sets in.
Such is the case with so many issues surrounding Hillary Clinton that one scarcely knows where to start. That Hillary has broken numerous laws with impunity is obvious to anyone who cares to look. What is turning this into a national disgrace is the blatant corruption of the legal process that allows her to continue on in her quest to be president while anyone else would be under prosecution.
It’s back to the email scandal and the failure of the FBI to do its job on page two.
Martin Warford Oh I totally agree. She is guilty 100% and should have been charged. She should be in jail right now. She knew what the C ment in all emails. State Dept has already released that her and her sheeple pleaded with them to change classifications. Her not being charged was a direct result of loretta lynch being promised a job by her as slick willy told her. i certainly hope that the new DOJ and upcoming senate hearings will put her away. And lynch and obama too.
Time for old killary to stand trial
Congress is a BIG part of the problem.
In honor of the Men Sacrificed in Benghazi to cover up illegal actions by both the former President and Secretary of State I for one would never stop looking into this. That deed was shameful to their memories and those lives left behind to grieve their loss. Get every last one of those Dirt Bags.
Troy Banks Bush pardoned Reagan? really, for what?
It’s not if Hillary is guilty, it’s just the number of crimes she is guilty of and who else needs to be arrested and sent to prison.
Trey Gowdy, let him at her!
Differential application of the law should be a criminal offense, and should be punishable by prison time. When we put our trust in people to apply the law fairly, violation of that trust is unforgivable.
Howard Randall Bechler If they were not, why should he be? The precedent would have already been set.
if you watched the house hearings there was also a preservation order, so you couldn’t destroy or redact