Once a nation’s justice system is determined to have different sets of standards for different groups of people, a repudiation of that justice system is not far behind. Principles like “equal protection under the law” go out the window, and a biting cynicism and even contempt for those government officials who purport to enforce the laws sets in.
Such is the case with so many issues surrounding Hillary Clinton that one scarcely knows where to start. That Hillary has broken numerous laws with impunity is obvious to anyone who cares to look. What is turning this into a national disgrace is the blatant corruption of the legal process that allows her to continue on in her quest to be president while anyone else would be under prosecution.
It’s back to the email scandal and the failure of the FBI to do its job on page two.
Jeff Seno Wrong moron, it was not a “continuation” of anything. The one that was proposed by the Bush administration was canceled because of the very thing that happened when the Obama administration OKed THEIR version of it. Get informed.
Remember who to vote for next time maybe we can get a whole new Congress an senate
Useless drivel.
She showed intent by destroying supeoned evidence against herself. She commited perjury lying to Congress about it. I won’t even start on pay to play and contributions to the Clinton Foundation. She needs to be in jail. I hear they have openings at GITMO.
Liberal motto: Do as I say, not as I do.
The Democratic Leadership is among the most pathetic in the world. Personally, I never thought much about Sessions until I found out the NAACP is opposed to him and that made me love and support him. I am sure Obama has his Lieutenants doing everything he can to undermine this appointment but he has not got the guts to come right out and say it.
Took them a while to put Capone away too.
Laws are for the peons.
Enough of Obama and his jaded ways of running this country.
What’s far more breathtaking is the right-wing appetite for distortion. Hillary Clinton had every right to destroy personal e-mails. There was never a subpoena demanding their production or the hard drive on which they were stored. The goofy idea that exchanging emails between parties with clearance constitutes espionage under the same statute violated by the Rosenbergs, Hanssen and Ames doesn’t even pass the laugh test. Period.