Once a nation’s justice system is determined to have different sets of standards for different groups of people, a repudiation of that justice system is not far behind. Principles like “equal protection under the law” go out the window, and a biting cynicism and even contempt for those government officials who purport to enforce the laws sets in.
Such is the case with so many issues surrounding Hillary Clinton that one scarcely knows where to start. That Hillary has broken numerous laws with impunity is obvious to anyone who cares to look. What is turning this into a national disgrace is the blatant corruption of the legal process that allows her to continue on in her quest to be president while anyone else would be under prosecution.
It’s back to the email scandal and the failure of the FBI to do its job on page two.
Anytime records are somehow missing or deleted, ALL PRSONS INVOLVED need to be arrested as enemy combatants and held by Indefinite detention without trial according in accordance with “National Defense Authorization Act H.R. 1540
Ron Hornback, your failure to recognize your own hypocrisy is mind numbing–typical flawed character trait common amongst you intellectually deficient progressive libtards!
The presumption here is, of course, your claim is fact based; although, you’ve failed to provide supporting documentation concerning a deletion order that preceded the Constitutional subpoena. Without such evidence, as most intellectuals would agree, that your claim is subjective at best!
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I’ll address your unsupported claim.
Let assume, for argument sake, that Hillary Clinton, or an agent acting on her behalf, issued an order to delete. This act, alone, would qualify as, “Willfully.” Likewise, could even suggest intent; although, not a required element for 18 USC 2071.
Now, let’s assume that, this unsubstantiated “order to delete” preceded the Congressional subpoena. Surely, you’re not suggesting that the order to delete supercedes the Congressional subpoena? That notion is just plan ignorant, wouldn’t you agree?
I’ll ignore the remainder of your post as a rant based on pointless prattle!
Democrats, democrats, democrats, democrats, democrats, democrats, democrats………………………..
Lock her up
I’m gonna like this guy
Ron Hornback, are you familiar with the term false exculpatory statements?
Hillary Clinton on several occasions lied about her illegal private server, the fact that she, both, sent and received classified materials on her private email server, and the use of multiple devices–all verified by director comey and the FBI investigation.
18 U.S. Code § 1001 – Statements or entries generally.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–292, § 2, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3459; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766; Pub. L. 109–248, title I, § 141(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 603.)
The issue here is director comey stated that hillary clinton was not under oath, when questioned by the fbi, nor were there any transcripts of this interview; however, comey asserts it’s still a crime to lie to fbi investigators.
Clearly, another political stunt to avoid prosecuting a career criminal, surely influenced by the politically biased, morally deficient, ethically depleted, and equally corrupt Loretta Lynch.
And based on you comments, your completely ignorant to these facts, and it’s clear, you wish to remain clueless!
Lola Rabern Fraser, you’re wrong!
Sessions, one of the good guys!
I know right
Illegal is the word!