Once a nation’s justice system is determined to have different sets of standards for different groups of people, a repudiation of that justice system is not far behind. Principles like “equal protection under the law” go out the window, and a biting cynicism and even contempt for those government officials who purport to enforce the laws sets in.
Such is the case with so many issues surrounding Hillary Clinton that one scarcely knows where to start. That Hillary has broken numerous laws with impunity is obvious to anyone who cares to look. What is turning this into a national disgrace is the blatant corruption of the legal process that allows her to continue on in her quest to be president while anyone else would be under prosecution.
It’s back to the email scandal and the failure of the FBI to do its job on page two.
No problem! Obama and Lynch cover for Killary!
Joe Roberts ..in practice only military use it. I wish people would stop printing this. Next day the judge retracted his statement!
John Langdon yes…people are misquoting this all over the net. In practice it is used primarily by military.
Janet Frasier ..are you serious? Read the comments… They are quite educational!
Bob Seniah actually the order to delete was sent out prior to the subpoena being issued. The difference in time was because of delays in the government system between notifications. Please educate yourself instead of believing you are all knowing and patting yourself on the back because of believing you are special
Bob Seniah if republicans take responsibility for their actions,why was George bush not tried for lying to Americans, authorizing torture outlawed by a treaty that America signed and is now not leaving the country to avoid possible trial by other country?
In reality, what you have done is generalized your statement and decided that you are actually a better person than anyone else.
This is another whiner-pants crybaby conservative that is willing to blame everyone for doing the same things that they do themselves. We never hear about that… do we?
Chip Wilcox you idea of proof and what can be proved in court are two different things. Even with your pocket constitution, you lack the ability to understand that just because you think they should be tried you are not a lawyer and I would guess there is a good reason for that
You need another
Gallon of KOOL-AID
Not for this REGEIME, they are desperately getting rid of the evidence.
Bob Seniah wouldn’t that be determined by intent? The reasoning for not indicting was because of intent. There are 100’s of people turning left in front of motorcycles and killing people. Seems they get off by saying “I didn’t see them”