For Americans who support law enforcement and trust them to safeguard both their liberties and their well-being, it is disheartening to hear officers say that the way to protect the latter is by curtailing the former.
San Jose Police Chief Eddie Garcia is one such officer, as he revealed in an interview with San Jose Inside. Asked about the topics of the day, Garcia not only expressed support for the controversial Black Lives Matter movement, but also voiced opposition to laws allowing Americans to own firearms for their protection.
As one might be wont to point out, a majority of law enforcement officers believe that Americans should retain the right to bear arms, meaning that Garcia is clearly in the minority on the issue. However, his position as chief of police for the 10th largest city in the country means that his opinion will carry weight among the uninformed and be cited by liberals as support for their anti-gun agenda.
Read more on the next page:
Hey numbnuts, when is the last time you saw a gang banger go through all legal channels to possess/carry a gun?
Idiot
Mike in case the government got out of control..
Mike Romanowicz Well, Mike Wilson didn’t answer me so why don’t you give it a try. Tell me why I can’t believe in gun ownership while at the same time have two reservations as I described above. (Although w/ Patrick Green’s AR description, I’m more confused about what one really is. I guess just the name “assault rifle” sounds so wicked for a homeowner’s use.)
Ive read enough. No matter what his opinion period hammering the Second Amendment will not fix that problem. forcing regulations and infringing on the Second Amendment for legal citizen is hindering their capabilities. The problem starts with illegal guns flooding the streets. Do you think maybe he should go do his job and find out where they’re coming from. or should he just asked the criminals to stop doing it because black lives matters say so…… He’s A Beat cop that wants everything to fix itself
Patrick Green Thank you for that extremely detailed gun description and history. So much more than I’ll ever need to know, but I trust others will certainly benefit from it.
And well regulated meant well-armed. To have the best most up-to-date weaponry available.
Some people seem to think it meant regulated (limited) by the government.
So then why is every police organization against Constitutional Carry ?
If it were possible to regulate guns out of existence, criminals would use these next.
Worthless cop