Albert N. Stubblebine III is a retired Major General in the U.S. Army and commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.
When it comes to both speaking about and respecting the horrific tragedy that unfolded on 9/11, nobody is his parallel.
In this jaw-dropping interview, he shares exactly what he thinks really happened that day. And it’s not what you’ve been told.
His perspectives as an insider familiar with the military give a very different perspective than what played out on television screens across the world.
And why might you ask? Why is the man who dropped to his knees in horror that day, revisiting the narrative to say his piece on the truth?
Major General Stubblebine outlined the heartbreaking truth in an explosive interview that it is ludicrous for any intelligent military intelligence commander to take the official 9/11 narrative as a viable explanation for what occurred on Sept. 11th, 2011. And furthermore, that they do not.
More on the next page, and this official interview,
Then I guess that all of us who were watching live didn’t see an airplane fly into the towers. Plus the ground videos show planes. Give us a break!
Gee, I guess I was only imagining what I saw hit the Pentagon when I was driving on 395! Time for the Generals pill and nap time.
He didn’t say there were no planes involved…….he is saying that the planes didn’t bring town the World Trade Center………this point has been been brought up before. The fact that the fuel of the planes couldn’t possibly melt those girders and bring down the buildings has already been pointed out by engineers and physicists.
The melting point of structural steel is 2500F…….jet fuel burns between 800-1500F…….FEMA’s own report estimated that there was only 3500 gal of unused jet fuel that burned that day — in fact, where one of the airplanes landed inside one of the towers, it was determined that the heating temperature of the jet fuel was minimal — there were three survivors from that very same floor as the plane came in at — Stanley Praimnath, Donovan Coroan, and Ling Young all evacuated, before the building collapsed.
The General is right…..something doesn’t add up. He is not disputing that there were airplanes involved, just the extent of the damage and the bypassed protocol doesn’t add up!
The General wasn’t disputing the fact that planes flew into the buildings……you may want to revisit his interview.
The melting point of structural steel is 2500F…….jet fuel burns between 800-1500F…….FEMA’s own report estimated that there was only 3500 gal of unused jet fuel that burned that day — in fact, where one of the airplanes landed inside one of the towers, it was determined that the heating temperature of the jet fuel was minimal — there were three survivors from that very same floor as the plane came in at — Stanley Praimnath, Donovan Coroan, and Ling Young all evacuated, before the building collapsed.
The General is right…..something doesn’t add up. He is not disputing that there were airplanes involved, just the extent of the damage and the bypassed protocol doesn’t add up!
So where is the plane and passengers?
If the towers had in fact been a controlled detonation: A. It would have been impossible to conceal from the thousands of people in those buildings every day. B. Preparation for a controlled detonation of that scale would have taken weeks. Much longer if we are to believe the preparation was done covertly. C. A controlled detonation would have left many tons of forensic evidence behind including literally miles of electrical wire. D. Imagine trying to coordinate a controlled detonation of that scale to coincide with the arrival of (huge random variable) airliners that were going to crash into the detonation sites. Unlikely in the extreme…
What a moron, there is video showing a plane hitting the Pentagon.
Funny the record dept was the one that was hit after it was announced that billions of dollars were missing from the Pentagon