“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Take one guess? 🙂
As a former police officer, I can tell you that there is absolutely no need for a police officer to have a bayonet.
It all has to do with Obama’s plan’s to get our guns!
WHAT IS THE SPIRIT OF THE BAYONET? “TO KILL! TO KILL WITHOUT MERCY!!!”
they have no need for a bayonet this war isn’t really going to get that close sharp and distance shooting will get the job done
lisahawks says:
“bayonets, really? seriously? we haven’t used those since WWII, have we?”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/rand-paul-local-police-need-bayonets/comment-page-5/#comment-489352
The police need to be police and stop looking like military want to be’s!!
bayonets, really? seriously? we haven’t used those since WWII, have we?
lisahawks says:
“no matter how the person is acting, they should NOT be killed with a bayonet, idiot”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/rand-paul-local-police-need-bayonets/comment-page-5/#comment-489363
we haven’t used bayonets since WWII, have we? there is no excuse for this