It was the moment when the entire world laughed at liberals and then lost all respect for the Nobel Prizes. When Barack Obama was announced as the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, even the fresh-faced president pretended to be a little shocked. “To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize,” Obama said at the time. Still, he accepted the prize over several other much more worthy candidates. What did he do to deserve the prize?
Now, in a traditional Homer Simpson “doh!” moment, a former director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute has acknowledged that, in hindsight, he’s not so sure if giving the prize to Obama was a good move either. More regrets on the next page:

Idiots
Why in the hell did you even think he deserved it in first place. You morons
Norwegian & Swedish liberals have LONG been desperate to be seen as major players on the world stage, pretending that their incestuous pandering to a corrupted United Nations lends them respectability. INSTEAD, Scandinavian liberals will be seen as NAIVE FOOLS for at least a generation!
They should take it back
more jerks
Very. True
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?
There was no reason for him to get it in the first place. Those guys are as looney as Obama is
Copy and paste from a good friend…makes sense
I’m not siding with Muslim interests and all but merely pointing out Interesting and true facts here about the direction of ‘commitment’ to the so-called ‘War on Terror’ and the positioning of American efforts …..
Fact: White men have committed the vast majority of mass attacks on US soil spanning the two decades between San Bernardino shooting and the Oklahoma City bombings in 1995. But the political and legislative response has disproportionately focused on Muslim as well as other ethnic communities. The Government has even categorized street gangs as a terrorist funding organization because they are revenue flow for many of the cartels who in turn work alongside overseas suppliers of opium (the largest imported controlled substance in the US drug market) which happens to be controlled by Muslim-based countries (like Afghanistan). It’s unreal how the pharmaceutical companies who also profit from the wholesale distribution and processing of opium are not categorized under the same term since legal opiates kill Americans at a ratio of 12-1 over street grade heroin. why is that? hmmm……
Fact: Even though the vast majority of mass shooters in the US bear commonplace names like Dylann Roof, Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Jared Loughner, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, and Robert Dear – anti-terror and counter-radicalisation programs are hardly concerned with prominent, and still proliferating, homegrown Caucasian terrorism. Instead they focus on opposite ethnic groups whether they be militia based or a social movement, as the enemy of the state. Investments for the so called ‘war on terrorism’ at home against other civil and/or social movements vs Caucasian groups is a disproportionate 25 to 1. These numbers are frighteningly similar to ratios found in the failed ‘war on drugs’ whereas those within the minority class have been targeted and punished extensively harsher than international drug ring leaders (Cartels) or political powers or U.S. corporations involved in the distribution and/or deaths caused by legal or illegal substances.
Fact: 63 percent of mass shooters since 1982 have been white men. Yet counterterrorism dollars and strategy in the US still fixate on a looming Muslim “threat” that seldom strikes. Counterterrorism dollars have actually been vacuumed by NSA and FBI wiretapping initiatives which have rarely targeted terrorism groups but in fact encroached on the privacy of U.S. Citizens not even classified as a threat to the United States. Phone calls, pictures, text, social media posts – all dumped into a massive international database under the guise of the patriot act, has weakened constitutional rights to illegal search and seizure laws. Looking at the actual lists of ‘presumed’ enemies of the state during the extensive collection of data by the NSA and FBI one may notice that neither ISIS, Al Qaeda,TMB or any other Islamic terror groups have been strongly targeted by the wiretap programs. Why? In fact, wiretapping of civil, social and economical leaders and political figures who were not at all ‘flagged’ as terrorists had been the bulk of data collected and analyzed by the federal agencies.
Do the homework fellas – there’s more to the hype of terrorists vs America and more about blinding Americans to the truth using separation, anger and hate …….
Make him give it back.