Barack Obama is once again circumventing the legislative process in order to push his administration’s unpopular leftist agenda. First, it was illegal immigration, then transgender bathrooms. This time, it’s guns.
Earlier this year, the White House announced new policies for those receiving social security benefits in conjunction with the president’s January 5th executive order on gun ownership. When it was released, few seemed to notice that the order allowed the administration to withhold Second Amendment rights from those who collect social security.
The move makes little logical sense. Social Security beneficiaries have never proven themselves as particularly violent or incapable of gun ownership. Instead, it seems as if this is part of Obama’s larger plan to slowly and surreptitiously restrict gun ownership whenever and wherever possible.
The administration was likely hoping that this slow creep of new regulations would go unnoticed until it was too late to be repealed. Fortunately, the watchful eyes of conservative media caught them in the act.
See Obama’s secret gun ban on the next page:

Misleading post from a source that typically misleads those who read just the heading. Read the article and think about what it says.
Just one more reason to vote for Trump!!!
You stupid mouth breathers. You will believe anything that is written about Obama.
That is why you will be left behind in this world.
Where in the$#%&!@*do you come up with this b******t propaganda?
You must pull this$#%&!@*out of your$#%&!@*
Have fun in your land of paranoia.
Well Sugar$#%&!@* to answer your first question, there was no COLA for Social Security because the REPUBLICAN CONGRESS voted against it. FYI: Congress controls spending. Take your meds Barbara.
Obama doesn’t control social security. And bills involving money have to start in the House of Representatives. That is republican controlled. Why not put the blame where it belongs?
Rick Cliffton why don’t you back up to the RNC and get another load. Be sure and get a kiss
Considering that what he does is defined within the constitution, I think we know where your head is.
if you support that SOB, then You are no American yourself!
Congress does not have a limit on executive orders and he hasn’t passed the number that George w bush wrote. Where do you get this c**p from?