UPDATE: We updated this article to address concerns after a reader cited research and recommendations by the fact-checking organization Climate Feedback.
Climate Feedback presented their analysis of our source article, including academic publications by several of its contributors. They concluded the article contained misleading and unsupported details:
Key Take Away
Temperature measurements made with different instruments and methods over time must necessarily be adjusted to ensure high-quality records of temperature that reliably represent changes. The adjustments needed for land stations in the United States often increase the apparent long-term warming, but overall, adjustments actually reduce the global warming trend.
What does an organization do when the real numbers don’t support the agenda they are pushing?
Sometimes they fudge the numbers. Cherry pick what helps prop up the lie and ignore the real facts.
This happens so often that The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been doing just that in order to support their biggest science scandal: global warming. Selling their brand of science, their “truth” about global warming brings in extra funding, yet their data is off by 50%.
For the past 18 years, satellites have shown no global warming, where as the “the land based data sets like the ones maintained by NOAA for the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN) continue to show a warming trend.” How can this be?
One explanation, by meteorologist Anthony Watts, shows NOAA using readings from areas that experience Urban Heat Island effect, that is instruments surrounded by buildings, roads or airports nearby which raises the temperatures due to local “environment” and not climate or weather.
Read more on the next page.
Follow the money to world wide corruption.
Al Gore’s Carbon Tax for his fleet of planes ,cars and mansion(s)) don’ forget the Hocky Graph that they down played sa a consenses rather than data. Consensus is not sience.NASA despite the billions of dollars spent has accomplised nothing (that we know of since we landed on the moon. Look at he private sector space program. NASa
Finally got caught, dumba::)
Nick Noelte: If you’re not with me/us, you’re against us. If you’re not a theist, you’re an atheist. My data is good, yours is bad. My sources are credible and valid, yours are not. I’m right you’re wrong.
Nick: “I think you’re confusing government here with private corporations. The government isn’t telling you to consume, but the big corporations sure are. ”
Response: See below:
What is quantitative easing?
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2015/03/economist-explains-5
How Governments Can Boost Consumption
https://hbr.org/2009/05/how-governments-can-boost-cons/
Minimum Wage Increase in U.S. Will Probably Promote Spending
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-27/minimum-wage-increase-in-u-s-will-probably-promote-spending
Spend, Spend, Spend. It’s the American Way.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/business/consumer-spending-as-an-american-virtue.html
Tax cuts ‘must encourage spending’
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/3419041/Tax-cuts-must-encourage-spending.html
(…and many, many more; see also below.)
Nick: “You see, you say the government is spreading propaganda to sell to consumers [support provided above], when here you are, spreading your own propoganda [sic] based in biased sources that aren’t at all related to factual data.”
Response: Says you. Your opinion, based on your “biased sources”. It’s called economic policy, and it’s referred to as Keynesian economics. Besides, politicians use government and corporate-owned media to promote themselves and their party, but how you fail to see this when proof surrounds you is beyond me.
Keynesian Economics
https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/macroeconomics/aggregate-supply-demand-topic/keynesian-thinking/v/keynesian-economics
Consumerism Is Keynesianism
http://fee.org/freeman/consumerism-is-keynesianism/
What Is Keynesian Economics?
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2014/09/basics.htm
What is Keynesian Economics?
http://www.wisegeek.org/what-is-keynesian-economics.htm
Nick: “If you’re an advocate for the natural world around you…”
Response: Listen to yourself. Well, Lou, you sure are a poor excuse and even disgrace for an outdoorsman and conservationist, and you should be ashamed of yourself. For not knowing much about politics and policy, you sure know how to use a politician’s tactic, a tactic religions have used for thousands of years, one the peer-collective Left seems to have mastered where the individualistic Right is less susceptible to. Don’t you modern liberals ever tire of the “shame game” to win your point?
Oh no liberals democrat socialist lying again
Nick Noelte: Thank you for the sources you provided, it’s more than most pseudo-liberals will do.
One or two million years after the next asteroid hit ,Earth will be beautiful all over again, be patient.
Derek Rehm
I would Bet they are supporting KILLARY ROTTEN CLINTON as well
We informed American know that the lying democratic party and the do nothing republican party having been cooking the numbers on their so called global warming.