New Research: Hillary Clinton Likely Picked Up 800,000 Fraudulent Votes

One of the unfortunate topics of concern related to the recently concluded election centers on whether there was any significant voter fraud. No election will be perfect, but the goal is to keep any errors or fraud so low that there is no way these factors can affect the results. Election 2016 brought this issue into the spotlight given allegations, primarily by Mr. Trump, that there had been significant voter fraud, primarily in California. Hence, a federal investigation is underway.

Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud.

Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion.

Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump.

Mr. Richman calculated that Mrs. Clinton would have collected 81 percent of noncitizen votes.

“Is it plausible that non-citizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes,” Mr. Richman wrote. “Is it plausible that non-citizen votes account for the entire nation-wide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.”

While almost a million fraudulent votes are more than just significant, even if this alleged fraud had not occurred, it would not have changed the result. Mrs. Clinton would still have won the popular vote, only by 800,000 fewer votes, and Mr. Trump would still have won the Electoral College vote which is the one that obviously matters.

Still, the finding is significant because it means noncitizens may have helped Mrs. Clinton carry a state or finish better than she otherwise would have.

Mr. Trump’s unverified accusation to congressional leaders this week, as reported by The Washington Post, has sent the issue skyward.

He apparently was referring to all types of fraud, such as the “dead” voting or multiple votes from the same person. But the thrust of his estimate appears to be that illegal immigrants and noncitizens carried the popular vote.

There is no consensus, and differing parties have divergent opinions.

The mainstream media reacted to Mr. Trump’s assertion with derision. Liberal pundits said there is no evidence of fraud.

CNN’s Jake Tapper called it “a stunning allegation for which the White House is providing no evidence. And there is a reason they are providing no evidence — there is no evidence. It is not true.”

On the other hand,

But conservative activists say the liberal media are ignoring evidence — that noncitizen voting is illegal and, thus, fraud. They say the Justice Department in the Obama administration was more concerned with preventing states from cleansing rosters of dead and inactive voters than in mounting any investigation into fraud.

“Most voters are never asked for voter ID, so it is dishonest to suggest that with the tens of millions of illegal and legal aliens here, there is no voter fraud,” said Tom Fitton, who heads the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch. “If the key Old Dominion study results on the 2008 election are applied to 2016 — 1.41 million aliens may have voted illegally, with 1.13 million voting for Democrats.”

What is clear, is that if anyone benefited from voter fraud including the participation in the balloting process by illegal immigrants, Mrs. Clinton was the beneficiary. Fortunately, it was to no avail.

Source: Washington Times



Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest