There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
I worked on those towers in 1969. I worked as a sheet metal worker. Building # 7 was part of that conglomerate of Towers. It fell to the ground just like the two towers fell. I was working on Madison and 45th street when the towers got hit. Say mid town I was working, could see everything as the planes hit.
michael if u aint on drugs please start taking them
Google “world trade center elevator and other renovation summer of 2001″…… if…..IF it was an inside job and controlled demo, I’d bet anything that’s how they got the explosives in
Google “world trade center elevator and other renovation summer of 2001″…… if…..IF it was an inside job and controlled demo, I’d bet anything that’s how they got the explosives in
Bull feathers,
F**k you!
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_uranium26.htm
Just how FAR up your STUPID$#%&!@*IS your EMPTY head?
If it was a missile(s) that hit the Pentagon , then why were there multiple witnesses that saw a plane?
Yep, in control of the terrorists!