A new 3-dimensional computer model simulated the alleged plane strike to the World Trade Center’s North Tower exactly as reported according to the 911 commission report.
These findings give a very vivid depiction as to how the Sept. 11th attack looks according to the official reports. Except unlike most simulations, this 3D model raises more questions than it answers.
The simulation carefully reproduces in 3D the entire airspace surrounding the North Tower of the World Trade Center as it stood before the attack on Sept. 11th, 2011. According to the official Commission, one of the attackers flew a Boeing 747 into the north face of the tower.
Official reports state that the buildings collapsed due to the heat and fires generated from the two planes crashing into the side of the buildings.
53 video clips were compiled by lead researcher Richard D. Hall into a 1-minute presentation to analyze if the footage was shown on the news the day of the attack aligned with the “official flight path”.
Learn more about this new investigation and watch the 3D simulation on the next page

Erik Emanuelson should we discuss how hot a office fire can get? and shall we discuss the breaking point temperature wise of concrete and what it does when heat breaks it down? and how steel bends at much lower temps?
The 1992 Rio Earth Summit was about forming a World government, the Documents were agenda 21. From the UN.
All World leaders agreed on NWO globalization.
Except a few that came on a list. Saddam and Gaddafi were on the list.
Now Syria, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Now Russia, are on the List of hold outs.
Ya it was a weather balloon reflecting some swamp gas
Many things people that watch TV don’t have a clue about, because the Media is F**e
They have been controlled since 1921, when the CFR was established
Erik Emanuelson and all the lies are in google as well, difference is real life over rides google idiots 🙂 stick with tile and let the ones who build handle actual building design and discussing it
This guy doesn’t understand physics and the strength of an aircraft wing. If he was an engineer I might believe his analysis but he isnt so It is pure BS
Anyway you can message this to me???
You know what, with technology today, this could easily be a “doctored” copy of the actual video, or even animated to make it look real.
What about building 7?