A new 3-dimensional computer model simulated the alleged plane strike to the World Trade Center’s North Tower exactly as reported according to the 911 commission report.
These findings give a very vivid depiction as to how the Sept. 11th attack looks according to the official reports. Except unlike most simulations, this 3D model raises more questions than it answers.
The simulation carefully reproduces in 3D the entire airspace surrounding the North Tower of the World Trade Center as it stood before the attack on Sept. 11th, 2011. According to the official Commission, one of the attackers flew a Boeing 747 into the north face of the tower.
Official reports state that the buildings collapsed due to the heat and fires generated from the two planes crashing into the side of the buildings.
53 video clips were compiled by lead researcher Richard D. Hall into a 1-minute presentation to analyze if the footage was shown on the news the day of the attack aligned with the “official flight path”.
Learn more about this new investigation and watch the 3D simulation on the next page
Yeah…they can’t get Trump…so they’re back to going after Bush….LMAO….so pathetic…..
Then what happened to the dead passengers ???
Did CNN take over this page?
Michael Curl explain the Pentagon! I’ve watched retired pilots say they couldn’t do that cork screw that these unexperienced towel heads did at that speed. They said flying that low at that speed, the ground turbulence would of made the plane crash way before the reached the Pentagon. Then theirs building 7…
Eric L Runion you are a fool. You believe it was Bush’s fault
Study structural engineering and physics. Good God.
Then what about all the people that died on the planes, I’m guessing you liberals are saying they didn’t exist, lol please, you just don’t want to give a republican credit for anything, George bush deserves more credit for the things he did during that time even if he wasn’t a great president, that was the only time when we didn’t fight as republicans and liberals, we all came together as one which is how it should be now, but these damn idiots out there on both sides start these groups and spread us apart, we should all be coming together again like we did then now fighting over who’s the better president or if it was George bushs fault or Muslim fault, go with what is in the history book and get on with your life’s
I worked for United States the time. Where did our plane go then?
Michael Curl
A plane at attitude in a dive can exceed design speed.
Planes are made with aircraft grade aluminum, which actually is harder then structural steel. The shape and speed of an object is more important then the object. Hyper kinetic weapons, made of aluminum and steel can penetrat deep into reinforced concreate.
There is no way that 3 buildings could of been rigged with RF controlled demolitions. With several transmitters on the roof of the towers, they could of set off any of them. To bring down one tower you would need @10,000 explosive devices. Both the RF Receiver and tje explosives would need to be in a explosion/Fire proof box.
The would of been sever devices that wouldn’t explode, RF devices are not reliable, that’s why all Controlled Demo companies use wired devices.
None of these boxes were found.
True jet fuel does not get hot enough to melt steel, almost all of the fuel would of been burnt off in the first 10 minutes,but the contents of the building would be on fire. Steel does weaken at lower temperatures. This weakening cause the streel to sag. In the design of the WTC this sagging would cause the exoskeleton to be pulled inwards. This weakened the supports and the floor above collapsed. The additional weight caused that floor to collapse and so on.
Look up high rise fire in Iran building collapse.
You said buildings were wired in advance. There would lhave to be hundred of miles of cable leading out of the building for at least 5 blocks, yet no one noticed them in 3 buildings
you dumb s##ts..i saw this entire horrible event as it happened…do not try to tell me some lie that fits your agenda.