Actress Julianne Moore is yet another artiste with strong, liberal opinions on subjects that she knows nothing about. She repeats the talking points lefty organizations give her (though she seems to confuse the details from one interview to another), and at the end of the day, her logic fails and it is clear that she is just another actress who pretends for a living.
Since she is a Hollywood celebrity, you can already guess that she is anti-gun, or as the Left dishonestly states, she is for “common-sense gun control.” For progressive celebrities and politicians, that means gun confiscation from ordinary citizens, but not from the armed security details that protect them during their every waking moment. The hypocrisy is stunning, but these folks never even see it!
See more on Julieanne on page 2:
Nobody ever said liberals were intelligent
Just another$#%&!@*liberal that has never worked for a living
Janos Marbles, apparently you’re uniformed, so pay attention! Now , I realize that the word pay may frighten you, but rest assured, this education is free! So, this should be right up your progressive liberal alley!
On June 26, 2008 the United States Supreme Court HELD: Delivered by Scalia; joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
“The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable the citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms.”
I want you to focus on this part of this 2008 Supreme Court ruling, “The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable the citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms.” The Supreme Court Justices clearly viewed that disarming citizens is still a vaible threat, this is why they include this statement in their ruling!
On a side note, and to finally put to rest this idiotic claim that t g e 2nd Amendment refers to muskets only! Many progressive liberals pose this flawed argument:”Because muskets were the weapons of the day when the Constitution was written, the 2nd Amendment refers to muskets only!” You’ll notice that the framers didn’t use the term, “Muskets.” Whether, by accident, or intention, the framers used the term “Arms.” And that term allows the 2nd Amendment, to the United States Constitution, the ability to advance with technology.
Now, to address your rediculous claim that the term, “Well regulated” somehow refers to the Federal government’s power to regulate firearms. Let’s narrow our focus on this statement, “The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms.” The word “Abridge” is defined–“to curtail.” “Curtail” is defined–“reduce in extent or quantity; impose a restriction on.” In other words, “regulate!” Which means that, Congress, the legislative branch–the law makers–our law makers, were denied the power to regulate the right of individuals to keep and bear arms.
However, the term “Well regulated” applies to the militia–“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,” refers to a well disciplined, well organized, well trained, and well armed citizens’ militia. Militia in defined– “A military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency. A military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities, typically in opposition to a regular army. All able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service.”
Furthermore, why would the framers write a contract (the United States Constitution) limiting the power of the federal government, only to give the federal government an avenue to seize more power, or complete power to rule? That’s like putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop–doesn’t make sense! And, if it doesn’t make sense, it isn’t true! The Supreme Court decision is clear!
Go lay down you stupid bimbo!
Wow what a moron
She is a moron
She’s just acting again
Hhhm don’t care guns but if it will make you money it’s ok,$#%&!@*Hollywood actor!
What????
No it doesn’t say that