Belligerent leftist J.K. Rowling is far more than just the author of a beloved children’s series. She also uses her massive influencing platform to encourage children that God is a liberal. Which is odd considering history proves God has been around far longer than the current debauched version of the liberal New World Order agenda. But, according to J.K. Rowling, she knows more than everybody else when it comes to understanding God.
While Pope Francis might agree with J.K. Rowling that the traditional understanding of God is outdated. Many people who’ve actually read the Bible find her recent statements to be a bit perplexing.
British J.K. Rowling made her highly controversial statements in response to the 2017 Alabama special election to replace Attorney General Jeff Sessions Senate seat. As despite being a Brit, J.K. Rowling seems to think it is her job to tell people in the U.S. about God.
Head on over to the next page to hear her full remarks on the new liberal version of God.
Bettie Brown hilklary clinton is the devil
J.k. Rowling is an aging spinster. No one cares! Harry Potter is a nerd!
Oh was there a new “visitation”!!!
The only sicko worse than her, is you. However, you are both equal trash.
She saw a movie
How would she know?
Obviously a Bible scholar!
Don’t put God in a box. God is everything.
David Liescheski Because of fools like you , who run their mouths but sit on their asses when it comes to doing good; and then place the blame on everyone but yourself.
That’s quite an arrogant point of view, Nick, but you are entitled to your opinion. My belief in God; however, contrary to your assumption, has nothing to do with ancestors, being accountable, and certainly not the goodness of humanity. It has everything ng to do with a rational, objective examination of the evidence related to my observations and experience. Considering the vastness of the evidence, it’s not likely that I will ever in this lifetime have the privilege of examining even a miniscule fraction of the totality of the evidence, so there is a possibility that I could, theoretically, be proven wrong. But the evidence I have seen has been very compelling, so it would take quite a dramatic, even miraculous, chain of substantial evidence to convince me otherwise.