What Obama says when the teleprompter is off can be very revealing. At the end of last year in Chicago the President fully admitted to breaking the law by totally circumventing the fundamental structure of separation of powers underpinning our nation.
Obama lied when he stated during his immigration speech that he wasn’t changing the law and that he was working within the limits of his office.
Watch as he completely contradicts himself, unintentionally revealing the truth:
SEE NEXT PAGE TO READ MORE + WATCH VIDEO OF OBAMA’S ADMISSION OF GUILT:
I can tell already this is going to outrage me.
Who is John Galt?
Typical liberal mindset, what’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine. The law doesn’t apply to us because we wrote it, it’s for you slaves
this S O B should be in prison not walking the streets
he needs to be publicly arrested….for treason…
its a lie anyway
R.I.H. obama
I NEED TEN PATRIOTS IN CENTRAL MAINE WITH COURAGE TO $#%&!@* ME AND VIDEO TAPE A CITIZENS ARREST!!!! MUST BE ARMED IF INTERSTED PLEASE MESSAGE ME! PLEASE SHARE I NEED TO REACH PEOPLE
THE CHARGE: TREASON AND VIOLATION OF THE CONS$#%&!@*UTION
These are the grounds
Supreme Court cases that are important to know.
The Cons$#%&!@*ution of the United States is the supreme law of the land – Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137
The right to travel is so basic it shouldn’t even be question – Shapiro V Thompson 394 US 618
No state may convert secure Liberty into a privilege and then issue a license or fee for it this includes drivers license, marriage license, car registration, license plate, gun permits of any type- Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 us 106
I can ignore the license and engage in the right with impunity that means you cannot punish me for it – Showsworth versus Birmingham Alabama 373 us 262
An uncons$#%&!@*utional act is not law, itnconfers no rights, poses no duties, affords no protection, and creates no office it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been past – Norton vs Shelby County 118 us 424
Willfulness is an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under law with immoral certainty I am using the Cons$#%&!@*ution and Supreme Court cases so I am NOT using evil motives – US vs Bishop 412 us 346
It shall be interpreted in my favor because I am clearly intended and expressly designated the beneficiary for the protection of my rights and property -16th Andrews prudent second section 97
Every man is independent of all laws except those prescribed by nature he is not bound by any ins$#%&!@*utions formed by his fellow man without his consent
Cruden v neale 2 n.c. (1796) 2SE 70
Then barry need to be arrested and outsed from the office he holding
The far left are all anarchists.