The Federal government has been seeking to expand it’s power for years, and President Obama has insisted that because he was a professor of Constitutional law he somehow is more equipped and capable to teach us how this country should run and why we must obey whatever he says.
He therefore jammed Obamacare through Congress with not one Republican supporter, and then somehow conned the Supreme Court into affirming that U.S. citizens MUST purchase insurance or be fined. This is typical of the lawless Obama administration, and we have truly become a banana republic, though that is not how the Constitution is written.
See the excellent video on page 2 regarding Constitutional limitations that are being violated.
The Federal governments seems to think that the citizens only own property leave of the government, and in essence that is true.
If a person buys a piece of property and pays property taxes on it, that is a form of rent paid to the government, and the government can seize that property and push the rightful owner off of that land if the taxes are not paid. How then does someone own a piece of property if the government can demand rent and evict if that rent or tax is not paid? It is stunning when seen this in the broad context, and true students of the Consititution will recognize the con that we have all bought in to.
The latest land and power battle is over father and son ranchers in Oregon by the name of Hammond went to jail on an arson charge. In 2002 and 2006, these ranchers decided to clear some brush and overgrowth on their ranch land by conducting a controlled burn, a very common activity in large areas such as their ranch in Oregon. The fire accidentally spread onto federal lands but was put out by the ranchers without any help from the feds. However, the Federal government still charged the ranchers with arson and are determined to jail them for 5 years each. Incidentally, the Federal land is flourishing, is now less of a wild fire hazard, and no properties were damaged in the incident.
The Constitutional attorney in the following video cites the Hammond case, but then goes on to instruct us on why it is only a small part of the huge overreach of the Federal government, as shown by the Constitutional limitations that the Federal government has been ignoring.
Watch video, page 2:
And she’s a lawyer,,,
This has Harry Reid and overbearing tyrannical government all over it
So the land obama confiscated in AZ from the Indians was illegal?? And didn’t he do it in another state?? I vaguely remember hearing about that last year……
What they are using to get away with this is that it is not owned by the government or DC. It is “public lands” which is owned by all citizens. A loop hole indeed.
Truth, the Feds own nothing! They hold it in trust for the people! That does mean they have the right to lease, prohibit entry and protect! The Oregon issue with the “Bundy’s” is trespass, arson and poaching and theft, nothing else. The trespass and kidnapping at the court house is an entirely hostile, imprisoning offense; not a patriotic deed! They will pay much more than the 10 seconds of fame this event will bring to them…
just saying…
They need to take a closer look a tax laws too, Gov. can only tax federal workers!
She knows!
This woman should represent the Bundy’s pro bono all the way to the supreme court.
If the government decides the land is “excess” they can sell.
But when Federal government has it in they hands they use it for things that does not help American citizens, they think they own it that’s why we need the Federal Government out of everything we can! Heath care needs out of it, everything, they are creedy animals! It should be long to local or state government and keep it out of the hands of already rich!