The Federal government has been seeking to expand it’s power for years, and President Obama has insisted that because he was a professor of Constitutional law he somehow is more equipped and capable to teach us how this country should run and why we must obey whatever he says.
He therefore jammed Obamacare through Congress with not one Republican supporter, and then somehow conned the Supreme Court into affirming that U.S. citizens MUST purchase insurance or be fined. This is typical of the lawless Obama administration, and we have truly become a banana republic, though that is not how the Constitution is written.
See the excellent video on page 2 regarding Constitutional limitations that are being violated.
The Federal governments seems to think that the citizens only own property leave of the government, and in essence that is true.
If a person buys a piece of property and pays property taxes on it, that is a form of rent paid to the government, and the government can seize that property and push the rightful owner off of that land if the taxes are not paid. How then does someone own a piece of property if the government can demand rent and evict if that rent or tax is not paid? It is stunning when seen this in the broad context, and true students of the Consititution will recognize the con that we have all bought in to.
The latest land and power battle is over father and son ranchers in Oregon by the name of Hammond went to jail on an arson charge. In 2002 and 2006, these ranchers decided to clear some brush and overgrowth on their ranch land by conducting a controlled burn, a very common activity in large areas such as their ranch in Oregon. The fire accidentally spread onto federal lands but was put out by the ranchers without any help from the feds. However, the Federal government still charged the ranchers with arson and are determined to jail them for 5 years each. Incidentally, the Federal land is flourishing, is now less of a wild fire hazard, and no properties were damaged in the incident.
The Constitutional attorney in the following video cites the Hammond case, but then goes on to instruct us on why it is only a small part of the huge overreach of the Federal government, as shown by the Constitutional limitations that the Federal government has been ignoring.
Watch video, page 2:
America bought that land from the rancher in the 1800’s because they had already destroyed it, then with tax payer money we have taken care of that and made sure they did they same. But these self entitled Mormons and their dying industry are mad their gravy train is over end of story.
More proof of uner informed voters here. N.Korea is a joke, Obama is not taking your guns, he is trying to stop it from turning into the old west, where the coroner and casket man make the most money. The #1 threat is climate change if you do not believe that then you know nothing of science or the world.
Huh ignorant people, i meet everyday. Believe what you like, i dont care. But time will tell and i will be proven right.
Tim Philpot imagine that no looting or damage of property. It’s all about the uranium rights the gov’t wants.
Both the Bundy and Hammond Ranch affairs are about control of significant amounts of uranium, and the BLM is willing to shed blood in order to procure this uranium for very nefarious purposes.
This article will unequivocally implicate Hillary Clinton in her role of deliberately committing abject treason against the people of the United States through the illegal appropriation of uranium at both the Bundy and the Hammond ranches and then selling the uranium to the Russians in order to help fund her presidential run through a largely untraceable offshore account.
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/clinton-is-selling-uranium-from-bundy-and-hammond-ranches-to-russians-to-fund-presidential-campaign/#dcQq80MqzE2CM1EL.99
Steven DCruz This is additional info about the land which is owned by gov’t.It’s different from your version: This might be the best part of the Oregon militia/rancher story.
Buried deep in the story is evidence as to why the government should never attempt to do anything.
As you probably know, the dispute revolves around a wildlife refuge. So why is that area set aside as a wildlife refuge?
“The refuge was established in 1908 by President Theodore Roosevelt to protect bird populations that had been decimated by plume hunters selling feathers for the hat industry.”
Got that? The government took a giant chunk of land because of the THREAT of the HAT industry. Because lots of people put feathers in hats, as you know. And the ongoing eternal threat of the HAT INDUSTRY was enough for a progressive to take “common sense” steps to make sure that the little birds had a safe place to build nests. AWAY FROM THE HAT PEOPLE.
The problem is, that there was no way to reverse the land grab after we all realized that almost no one on earth puts feathers in hats anymore. The government just gets to keep the land.
But, of course they do. This is what government does when given the opportunity. Whatever the legitimacy of the concern of the day, it’s yet another example of how power is acquired and never relinquished.
My new years resolution: MORE FEATHERS IN HATS.
More overreach of the Grab-ament . When will folks start waking up ?
Love KrisAnne Hall ! Had her on my radio show! She is the best! The Negdog Radio Network!
then the states need to take all fedral parks and everything else from the federal government, and everything else that they can.
they will try and bully their way to do it