The Federal government has been seeking to expand it’s power for years, and President Obama has insisted that because he was a professor of Constitutional law he somehow is more equipped and capable to teach us how this country should run and why we must obey whatever he says.
He therefore jammed Obamacare through Congress with not one Republican supporter, and then somehow conned the Supreme Court into affirming that U.S. citizens MUST purchase insurance or be fined. This is typical of the lawless Obama administration, and we have truly become a banana republic, though that is not how the Constitution is written.
See the excellent video on page 2 regarding Constitutional limitations that are being violated.
The Federal governments seems to think that the citizens only own property leave of the government, and in essence that is true.
If a person buys a piece of property and pays property taxes on it, that is a form of rent paid to the government, and the government can seize that property and push the rightful owner off of that land if the taxes are not paid. How then does someone own a piece of property if the government can demand rent and evict if that rent or tax is not paid? It is stunning when seen this in the broad context, and true students of the Consititution will recognize the con that we have all bought in to.
The latest land and power battle is over father and son ranchers in Oregon by the name of Hammond went to jail on an arson charge. In 2002 and 2006, these ranchers decided to clear some brush and overgrowth on their ranch land by conducting a controlled burn, a very common activity in large areas such as their ranch in Oregon. The fire accidentally spread onto federal lands but was put out by the ranchers without any help from the feds. However, the Federal government still charged the ranchers with arson and are determined to jail them for 5 years each. Incidentally, the Federal land is flourishing, is now less of a wild fire hazard, and no properties were damaged in the incident.
The Constitutional attorney in the following video cites the Hammond case, but then goes on to instruct us on why it is only a small part of the huge overreach of the Federal government, as shown by the Constitutional limitations that the Federal government has been ignoring.
Watch video, page 2:
Must see for people who ate a lot of lead paint chips as a child.
there is no such thing as federal land….the land is state controlled..unless privately owned
David Cisik Sr…what is it all about god with you people. True American’s don’t fear god, we walk in partnership with God and Goddess.
OK. Let’s give all Federal land back to the Native Americans
She’s right and She is very hot when she talks like this. Love it!!
So, the federal government can’t own land, eh? The how is it they made the Louisiana Purchase? And purchased Alaska from Russia, and most of the West from Spain/Mexico?
Damn, guess I am living in Mexican territory…
oregon militia should kill themselves
so where is the police military feds sworn to uphold law when so blantly broken
Clearly, the Federal authority can, and is expected to control and protect lands in America. This has been proven time and again, not beginning with, but not limited to the establishment of the world’s first national park, Yellowstone by congress in 1872 and signed iinto law by Ulysses S Grant (Republican). Malheur was established in 1908 by Theodore Roosevelt, another Republican. Funny, that. http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/4/essays/126/property-clause
This is the part nobody understands, the STATES should govern the land within its borders not meddling federal bureaucrats, feds pay no property tax and squelch economic use of the land.The American sheeple simply cant figure it out and hurl invectives at farmers trying earn a living and produce food.