A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
Rick Ripley not right already declared it they took over all leader positions and declared it it is hamtrack,Michigan
Gerald Miller got rid of alcohol out of stores and blasting their screaming what they call music over loud speakers
No warrant with due process and you are a home invader and will be treated as such. My usual policy for violent home invaders is to respond with an equal amount of violence. Anyone affected by this law should do the same. This is unconstitutional and illegal.
Get a warrant.
Wrong
Agenda 21!
No warrant without good cause is against the law, so$#%&!@*off kiss my$#%&!@*and what ever else I can think of
Here we go folks!
People in that city should have the right to inspect the peoples home of that city who run that city..Lets see what they are hiding!”
Not right…we are all loosing our rights fast.