A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
There’s a big difference in establishing safety and issuing license to do something, the first one is moral, the second is corrupt and should only be applied as needed…..as in “there have been complaints” and not used to usurp peoples rights to privacy and liberties.
So you think you live in a free country, Ha Ha Ha
They don’t own the home. Seems to me that is the difference. Of course the city will probably use this in future cases to enter actual home owners homes. But then again, Minnesota elected a wrestler for a governer and has a comedian for a senator, so how are we suppose to take that state seriously?
B******t right winger nonsense.
And with sharia law coming to Minnesota you can’t trust the gov’t
I’m from New Jersey but I understand that Minnesota have been importing illegal emigrants for years and giving them free medical, education, etc.
No one has an explanation for this, and it seems very suspicious.
The last eight years of the present Administration has not helped, things are getting worse. This is why I’m voting for Donald Trump, maybe he can help.
The way things are going you are right.
Get a warrant, or take a hike.
So sharia law is constitutional…i dont think so ..