“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Get a life and live it! Patriots would support their president.
Patriots are never for the government they are for the nation. Your Small mind can’t fathom the difference.
YES; YES; YES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST DO IT NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!
What crimes has Obama committed exactly time and date against the senate
we called the Sergeant of arms office and told him to arrest Obama or resign if he can.t do his job i was told there is nothing he can do
can you spell INPEACH
Some of you people watch far to much wrestling.
Think back to your civics class.
Impeachment has to start in the house. Then the trial is in the Senate. If convicted then a sitting president can be arrested etc….
No ONE has the unilateral power to arrest a President.
He has executive immunity and privilege.
This status quotes, or partially quotes a website. Not a law.
Big Difference ….
Please educate yourselves
Then dump him and get one who will
Sheryl Kenning that’s right he canr, because people believe this BS
Walter Jones Sr. .. No one can, its not legal.
Gail Seger.. can you spell its Impeach