“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
And who will prosecute him? Eric Holder….
Please arrest him before someone assasinates him, this dude belongs in LEAVENWORTH………..
Please !
They should both be arrested for derliction of duty
This needs to be done today or sooner.
If he doesnt have the balls to do it then replace him with somebody that does.
Like Jan Brewer or.Sarah Palin!
get rid of him if he don’t do his job he is either ths sgt at arms or a conspiritor
That honorable determination that animates every votary of freedom, to rest all our political experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government. – James Madison http://voteIAP.us/ http://independentamericanparty.org/ http://crossculturenm.weebly.com/ http://askthepastornm.weebly.com/
You will need to determine which form of parliamentary procedure the Congress is currently using. I think they are using Robert’s Rule of Order, but I may be wrong on that. Once you have determined which parliamentary procedure they are using, you should be able to look up and find your answer.
Dalton, get a new card. The race card is worn out…