California liberals are it again, this time going after ammunition instead of guns.
In a new legislation called the “Safety for All Act of 2016” voters will be able to ban the possession of magazines with a capacity greater than 10 rounds and mandate that everybody in California get a “firearms purchaser certificate” in order to buy ammunition, which will not only cost up to $50.00 and take two months to get, it’ll also put you in a database for law enforcement.
See what else it entails on the next page.
Another highly effective maneuver by the brain dead liberals in Cali…..did they ever consider that one could simply cross state lines to purchase ammo? Far surpasses incompetent!
on–freefulllivestreamingfullmovie.blogspot.com
finally Movies Original
Fifty Shades Of Grey 2015 UNRATED (+18)
Genres: Drama | Romance
I just got back from a trip for work from San Francisco. What a beautiful city and I also got to drive around outside of San Francisco a bit, what a beautiful state. It’s too bad that such a wonderful place has to be destroyed by liberalism.
I saw more gay pride flags flying with the state flag, freaks, Trendies and just plain propaganda than I care to admit. Everywhere you look there signs reminding you of the latest staged mass shootings, signs that tell you to snitch to the cops on “suspicious activity”. The signs reminding everybody of the geo-engineered drought they are pushing. Most of all the signs everywhere reminding you that every single thing in your environment will give you cancer.
I’ll confess I flew out there with my pistol and of course I abided by all their little laws. I hope for the sake of all the patriots and good people that live in California they can do something to get there communist problem under control.
Sad that so many people can be so wrong.
http://www.gunfacts.info/gun-control-myths/guns-in-other-countries/. Maybe the libtards should read this before passing there laws. Good luck trying to enforce this ridiculous law.
Stupid fags
, woo this will sure stop the gang bangers
Just like in Massachusetts.. Prices went up at the counter, however wholesale prices remain the same. Who’s making out? Business..
Short Version—-
To those of you who swore an oath to support and protect the U.S. constitution….
Remember…..
“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same….that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.”
Notice, there is NO EXPIRATION DATE, the oath is for an indeterminate period; no duration is specifically defined, none……
So what, exactly, have you done to honor the oath you took to Uphold and Defend the Constitution…your obligation to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic?
If you can’t/won’t answer these questions with exact actions or participate in an honest dialog, then you are hereby charged with Dereliction of Duty and Treason…
I pray to the Creator that you have the strength to hear and face the truth and rethink your time served in the dark.
2nd Amendment: Original Meaning and Purpose
When the Constitution was signed on September 17, 1789, federalists claimed the new government would only have limited powers expressly delegated to it. This wasn’t enough for anti-federalists like George Mason, who wanted explicit guarantees to certain rights in order to prevent any potential encroachment by the federal government.
One of them was the right to keep and bear arms. Mason wrote:
“A well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free State”
The Founding Fathers, having just broken away from Great Britain, understood the new federal government they were ratifying might one day become just as tyrannical. If it had the authority to control citizen access to firearms, then it could disarm them, just as the British attempted to do. This would make any attempts to restore liberties futile.
The Second Amendment was specifically included in the Bill of Rights to prevent this.
Two centuries later, we are in an ideological struggle with gun control advocates attempting to alter the meaning of the Second Amendment in order to allow for federal restrictions on our right to bear arms. Not surprisingly, they completely ignore what the ratifiers of the Constitution and the Second Amendment had to say, because all pertinent historical documents contradict them.
For example, when the Founders wrote of a “well regulated” militia, they meant militias needed to be well regulated through training and drilling in order to be effective in battle. This could only happen if citizens had unrestricted access to firearms.
James Madison, the father of the Constitution, said in 1789 that “A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.”
An example of a well regulated militia under Madison’s definition were the Minutemen at Concord and Lexington, who had drilled on fields in preparation for war.
As to the meaning of the word “militia,” it has nothing to do with the National Guard. There is already a clause in the Constitution that specifically authorizes arming them.
So what is a militia as defined by the Founders? Mason said they were “the whole people, except for a few public officials.”
In fact, there was a universal acceptance among both federalists and anti-federalists as to the importance of the right to bear arms.
Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 28 that “if the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense,” a right which he declared to be “paramount.”
And then there is clause “shall not be infringed.” There is no exception to this contained anywhere in the amendment.
Zacharia Johnson, a delegate to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, summed up the meaning of the Second Amendment when he declared that “The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.”
Full possession. Not some. Not most. Full possession of their weapons. The feds were to keep their hands off entirely.
The Founders made it very clear what the Second Amendment means. But if we do not fight against any and all attempts by the feds to infringe upon our right to keep and bear arms, then it loses all relevant meaning.