WikiLeaks’ first email dump in their “Hillary Leaks” series seems to be proving many things that we have long suspected.
First, they proved that the Democratic National Committee’s unfair treatment of Bernie Sanders was no accident. It was the result of a concerted effort to stop the socialist senator from clinching the nomination. Now, evidence that the DNC is giving direct orders to the mainstream press has come to light, as well.
Of course, it doesn’t take a genius to guess which network was doing the bidding of the Democrat party — it was MSNBC.
In an exchange between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, the Democrat National Committee Chair seemed to order Todd to put an end to stories that claimed that her party was — get this — purposefully mistreating Sanders.
How ironic.
After the revelation, Todd was confronted about the exchange on Twitter. See the confrontation on the next page:
This will hurt NBC’s credibility but, as we’ve learned over time – who cares?
Keith Kunschman No hackers had to give us the truth
Roger Flanigan and we had this for 8 years
Duh
Bart Gautreau trump was elected because we didn’t want more of obama and everyone knew what a criminal hillary was (that’s why all the big cities (and only the big cities–chicago, new york etc) voted for her–they are all democratic controlled, they all have the highest crime rate, murder rate and illegals—in other words they voted for one of their own)
Msnbc needs to be restricted from whitehouse press core based on unethical mis representing the news as biased
If it’s from WikiLeaks, you know that it’s true and unbiased (not). That’s why they say “seems to show”, rather than “definitely shows”. They use the implication rather than definitive, so they can have wiggle room if they are sued.
Funny thing is, Tom, they are just as reliable and trustworthy as Snopes and other liberal fact checkers. But they tell us what liberal media won’t.
So does the Star tabloid. Get your news while checking out at the grocery store.
Joke