WikiLeaks’ first email dump in their “Hillary Leaks” series seems to be proving many things that we have long suspected.
First, they proved that the Democratic National Committee’s unfair treatment of Bernie Sanders was no accident. It was the result of a concerted effort to stop the socialist senator from clinching the nomination. Now, evidence that the DNC is giving direct orders to the mainstream press has come to light, as well.
Of course, it doesn’t take a genius to guess which network was doing the bidding of the Democrat party — it was MSNBC.
In an exchange between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, the Democrat National Committee Chair seemed to order Todd to put an end to stories that claimed that her party was — get this — purposefully mistreating Sanders.
How ironic.
After the revelation, Todd was confronted about the exchange on Twitter. See the confrontation on the next page:
I will not promote any f**e news site. Because it’s setting a bias agenda. If you want to post something from a credible site then I will give you a credible opinion
I posted about WikiLeaks coming from The Washington Post. But you never commented they’re credible
Duh
Wow! Didn’t read that in any of the hacking investigations info! Them Russians have to be some kind a tricky sumbiches!
Speaking of bias agenda. You don’t think MSNBC or CNN is bias??? An unbiased network isn’t in he bag for either candidate. They also report both sides.
Nope putting the responsibility where it lies
By the way now Wikileaks is credible??? Hell thats funny 2 months ago they weren’t.
I used to like Chuck Todd. During the campaigns though his reporting took an acid twist. No longer trustworthy journalist. Just a lackey.
Washington Post is credible
Tracy Simon Jones BS