Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Damn that’s ugly squared
Before I read and find out her alias my guess is Horse Face.
Horse face
Evil!!!
Evil incarnate.
Like mother, like daughter. Both corrupt.
Evil. Big evil
Prove she’s corrupt? Life is proof. Pieces of paper, photos, fingerprints and emails are evidence. Who reasonably expects the GOP to charge, arrest, try and convict anybody if the very first thing they must do is confess to their own crimes??? Ppl who are at fault or guilty do not possess the ability to do so as to get here? All involved had to enter deep denial aka delusion. Ppl who are delusional cannot then discern if others are or not, get it? They have no point of reference. They’re actually psychologically incompetent.
Lowell Gayheart has never served in the government because he would know that one is guilty until proven innocent.
Wow Chelsea is ugly , Halloween witch