Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
They could haunt houses ugly
Clinton apologists should read “Clinton Cash “. A well documented and factual expose’ of the Clinton’s and the Clinton Foundation.
A criminal needs a good alias.
Why is any one surprised?
She’s a liar, she had to sign a statement to that effect that she was briefed and understood what she was told about classified material. She’s full of$#%&!@* a liar and treasonous wench putting our lives at risk for monetary gain.
What body count name one person that they killed you can’t
Don’t believe anything wiki leaks posts they are criminals that illegally hack computers and that’s a crime
Please quit giving this cccccbitch any air time let her fade away out of press
John , you can’t name one person that Gambino personally killed either , but you know that he decreed that it be done on his behalf . Same-Same .
Don’t look into their eyes, the devil will get you.