Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Listen. I don’t hate trump. I’m rooting for him. I think liberals are babies, but I’ll call out hypocrisy, like you attacked Hillary for. And I hate Hillary
Evil
Why R we not surprised (Crooks)
Birds of a feather.
You guys are so naive. Do a google search for how much money Conde Rice, G. W. Bush and Colin Powell make as speakers and consultants. Check the Clinton Foundation tax reports. Every dime that the Clintons have earned is explained and taxed.
Todd Feinberg accepting 225 million from a foreign nation V saying, stay in my hotel are not the same.
Is that the Joker?
2 of a kind
Alias was Horseface
The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.