Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Brit brat!! Spider bomb
Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree
Both Devil in disguise
Carlita Dangerous?
Obama used pseudonym on Hillary’s unlawfully insecure server too- prosecute them all for perjury & espionage act violations https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2016/09/23/fbi-docs-obama-used-pseudonym-to-email-hillarys-server/?client=safari
Jim Noyes
Your name says it all.
People are supposed to stop trashing Trump but the righties just can’t seem to let go of Clinton either … even though she lost the election. Best you help your candidate focus on governing … he needs the assistance.
Obama used pseudonym on Hillary’s unlawfully insecure server too- prosecute them all for perjury & espionage act violations (& Chelsea married Soros’ nephew) https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2016/09/23/fbi-docs-obama-used-pseudonym-to-email-hillarys-server/?client=safari John L. Youngblood
Revealing.. entrenched evil
Two POS’s