Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Both ugly as hell!
Such very EVIL eyes these 2 have …
Now why would they do that? Hmmmmmm
Yep she is. You’d think that with all their money she would at least have the ugly teeth fixed.
Michael Mead BFD. Is there a reason you posted it twice ? Did you forget after the first time ?
Everyone realizes this thread is a highly rated f**e news thread right. It is a Russian state sponsored thread
Wilbur?
F**e news?? Who knew??
Look…it’s dumb and dumber.
Everything about the Clinton’s is crooked. That is Hillary, Bill and Chelsea. They have illegally made a huge sum of money.