Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Doesn’t that indicate knowledge and intent, given the circumstances….?
Secretariat
Imagine that. Lmfao.
Faces of evil.
The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Still say …paint her face green and she’ll look exactly like Jim Carrey when he played the Grinch…
Send both of these traitors to prison.
Beyond corruption.
Just two of a kind ( Super crook an crook in training )
I hope the investigations continue and they have to spend all their ill-gotten gains, sell all their mansions and the furnishings they filled them with that they stole from the White House and the State Dept. to pay their lawyers fees. Evil and her evil spawn should never live the life of luxury by stealing in the name of charity.