Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
I knew this months ago….
Obigot use a f**e name too
Bucky Beaver?
Two pieces of c**p.
what do you mean the whole family is f**e LOLOLOL
It worked for David Ortiz when he tested positive for doing PED’s. He claimed he didn’t know they were illegal and they gave him a free pass.
I wonder if her husband takes cheating lessons from daddy-in-law!
Cinderella’s ugly step sister?
Every name except “DENTIST”
The Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree and these two were full of worms and rotted before they hit the ground.
Gone. Who gives a$#%&!@* B