Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Todd Feinberg arrogant idiots like you are why you lost the election, yeah we all knew what that was before Fox told us, do not get how ridiculous you people look now…so hey instead of the insults,how about telling us why you think the money to the clinton “foundation” has dried up??? almost 40% , how do you account for that??? hmmm no favors , no money??? gee is that pay & play….LOL I dont expect an answer, libs insult, they NEVER answer a question…
I bet that girl has to sneak up on a glass of water !!!
Well we are all just stupid so who cares?
Greg Sparks yes I do and yes I am.
Nobody gives a$#%&!@*about these$#%&!@*I wouldn’t post a thing about them good riddance…
Who cares??? They’re fucking history!!!
like mother like daughter deceitful and liars she learnt well
I’m scrolling down my face book page and then these 2 faces show up . WHY ?! I was looking forward to dinner now i just lost my appetite . Thanks !
road kill and howdy doody clone two slime buckets.
Dumb and dumber