Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Let me guess, she used her dear old dad’s name, and the alias was C. Hubbell.
With all those foreign pay to play “donations” they should have hired plastic surgeons and a cosmetic dentist!
Evil, crooked, UGLY, lying, power hungry, ruthless, bitches with no conscience!
Enough of the Clintons and more of the Flintstones.
Oh my no. I ant tell you the f**e names my daughter came up with over the years. If that’s a crime we are guilty as well. Right Lola ?
Looks like a pair of jackasses eating briars
That is called deceit….. both are thieves and should be locked up…. taking money from your charity foundation to buy your self an apartment and pay for your wedding is not how the donors expected their money to go too….. they expected the money to pay for the favors they asked for….
Just two evils we can let them back in the system so we can protect our children and grandkids from these two
Mr Ed?
Webb Hubble makes ugly children.