Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Man did we dodge a bullet not letting these people back into the W.H.
Greg Sparks wow. no wonder you are single!! ugly as a bag of maggots!!
This is just another example of why you can never trust a Clinton
Chelsea Hubbell.
They are not pure evil. Just pure white trash grifters Pure evil would be more intelligent. Just sayin…
Leland Schmitt Another ignorant blanket statement… When will people realize that it’s wrong to judge people without actually knowing who they are? Plus Agnosticism is one of the most reasonable of all beliefs imo.
S**T— 1 IS BAD ENOUGH BUT, 2 AT ONCE
These are two she devils, so look out
Tooth brush maybe
What the he’ll is with those cheeks