Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Dumb and Dumber
Look, to she devils
Mark Long shhhh lil fella.
He is a real piece of …
Santa Dave Fergy Ferguson Fidel used those same words
Darlene Somrak Howe progressive LOL.
Everything you idiots come up with hamstring a free society
Greg Sparks who said Trump was gorgeous?
Stay on track oh flighty one.
Please list documented proof of damages he has done.
With what we know about Hillary Chelsea should never be allowed to be elected to a position where nations secrets or confidential documents are see by any of the Clintons. I suspect that this government is so corrupt and Hillary has dirt on people where she can Blackmail politicians for Top Secret documents., which amounts to treason. If we believe that the Clintons are finished that could be a very dangerous assumption. Until they are in prison or the ground no one from the Clinton family can be trusted
All have bad genes – NEVER.