White House Globalists Create “The Committee to Save America” to Usurp Trump Admin

Axios has chosen to publish a bare bones bullet list of theories and conjectures by Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei that masquerade as real news.  Undeniably intriguing on the surface, it quickly becomes apparent that these two writers, who have shown through their previous works how beholden they are to the Swamp Establishmentariat, have a spectacularly tremendous ax to grind when it comes to Trump and they make no qualms about how they feel about our president.

It’s clear from their writing that they not only view President Trump as an extremely ignorant person, but also do not value his intellect in the very least, which is admittedly surprising considering that he is a multi-millionaire who is not taking a dime from the American taxpayer outright for salary, and has built his own real estate empire over decades.  Despite wins and losses, the fact remains that he is a success story.  Yet, these two writers make it sound as if he is a complete idiot who requires constant handling and babysitting; otherwise, he’ll make a rash decision that will endanger the entire country!

Here’s one of the most intriguing — and consequential — theories circulating inside the White House:

The generals, the New Yorkers and Republican congressional leaders see themselves as an unofficial committee to protect Trump and the nation from disaster.

This loose alliance is informal.

But as one top official told us: “If you see a guy about to stab someone with a knife, you don’t need to huddle to decide to grab the knife.”

It’s just the beginning of the piece and already, I’m feeling like this is a direct insult on Trump, equating him to a madman with a knife who can only be stopped by the actual adults in the room…his advisers.  It really is not only an insult to Trump, but to all his supporters and I really feel like saying to these two pompous slaves to the system that no amount of their “anonymous source material” is going to convince me that Trump’s hand is being held by his advisers.  If anything, they are following his orders to a “T,” which is precisely why the necessity of a piece like this occurs.  If Trump were as ineffective as they’re claiming, they wouldn’t even bother talking about his policies or advisers.

The theory was described to us in a series of private chats with high-ranking officials:

The generals — White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — speak frequently, see the world similarly and privately express a sense of duty to help steer Trump. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Joseph Dunford, is an ally.

The New Yorkers, including economic adviser Gary Cohn and Deputy National Security Adviser Dina Powell (with 25 years of foreign-policy experience), have subsumed some of their personal views to blunt Trump’s worst ideas. This crowd is highly skilled at communicating with the president (using visuals and grand positioning) to refine or moderate “America first” provocations. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin is also very involved, helping demand a process where POTUS has all the information to make domestic and international economic decisions.

Republican congressional leaders won’t win any profiles in courage for standing up to Trump. But almost all could move against the president if special counsel Bob Mueller finds crimes, or the president succumbs to radical instincts.

As we can see, the hackles on these two Establishmentariat-backers are raised and they are baring their teeth in an effort to convince all their RINO buddies that [whispering] “All of America is behind you!  Everybody in America really hates Trump and they know you’re all really behind all the decisions of the administration!”

These officials see their successes mostly in terms of bad decisions prevented, rather than accomplishments chalked up:

They view their main function as getting real facts to the president, and injecting their belief in the importance of alliances and military relationships around the world.

As an example, if Trump had plunged ahead with his thirst for a trade war, the U.S. might not have won China’s backing in the U.N. vote last weekend for sanctions against North Korea.

Um, first of all, if Trump wanted a trade war, he would have had one.  In fact, if the trade negotiations are going so in the favor of everyone else, why is it that both Mexico and Canada are panicking about fairness being inserted into the agreements.

As well, many Chinese businesses already committed to opening up massive amounts of job-creating factories in the United States, despite Trump’s insistence of tariffs on their imports.  That argument is weak and it appears that both Allen and VandeHei are banking on their readers not realizing that China, as much as the United States, wants a tamed and docile North Korea.  Their halting of Chinese oil to North Korea had nothing to do with Trump’s trade policies and everything to do with the United Nations sanctions imposed earlier.  It’s ludicrous to believe this tenuous link to trade had anything to do with sanctions against North Korea.

These officials pick their battles, knowing that Trump is going to go ahead with some decisions — like renouncing the Paris climate agreement — no matter what.

Well, if he is making a decision to “renounce the Paris climate agreement” in their words “no matter what,” why would he back down on any other decision…”no matter what?”  This again, is a really weak and moronic argument that Trump makes one “extremely stupid decision that no one on Earth can possibly stop him from making” but on every other life-threatening, massively, globally important decision, his advisers must cast their bodies in front of the bus in order to stop him “murdering the world!”  I’m completely convinced, aren’t you?

And much of what they do is silent. AP reported that Mattis and Kelly, when he was still Secretary of Homeland Security, “agreed in the earliest weeks of Trump’s presidency that one of them should remain in the United States at all times to keep tabs on the orders rapidly emerging from the White House.”

Hold on, the Associated Press reported this?  That Mattis and Kelly engage in some bizarre rock, paper and scissor game to determine whose turn it is to mind the asylum?  The Associated Press?!  Well, if THEY said it, then by all means, it MUST BE TRUE!  How silly of us to doubt the words of the almighty AP!  Just think:  When you have a Fake News organization the likes of the AP that combines all the major Leftist Fake News Industrial Complex journalism outfits on Earth, it’s no wonder so many “unnamed sources” are riddled throughout their work.

These officials think Trump deserves a functioning staff, West Wing and process. They say they believe in him, but want the processes in place to give him accurate information and the right options.

Outside critics contend that these aides are rationalizing their role as enablers.

Be smart: One of the biggest dangers to Trump’s reign is that if Mueller acts or public support plummets, he suddenly could be lonely in his own White House.

TRANSLATION:  “We can only hope and pray that Mueller finds something…ANYTHING…that will nail this b**stard to the wall!”

I’m sorry, but this ridiculous piece of Fake News just helps me to solidify my support for Trump and understand that the enemies of our president are not just on the Left.

Source:  Axios