The Second Amendment scored another courtroom win this week, as a federal judge ruled that Washington D.C.’s “good reason” provision is “likely unconstitutional.” The rule in question mandated that citizens of the nation’s capital show they had a legitimate purpose for gun ownership before they were granted the right to purchase a gun.
Of course, there should be no question about it, gun ownership is a fundamental right in the United States. While certain sections of the constitution remain arguable hundreds of years after their ratification, the Second Amendment contains perhaps the most clearly written of all our constitutional rights: “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Somehow, liberals across the country have attempted to twist those simple words to fit their anti-gun agenda. While many gun restrictions remain on the books throughout the United States, purchasing a firearm in D.C. may have just gotten much easier.
See the decision on the next page:
that means felons get there rights back to own guns and we as citizens get our rights back to own fully automatics with 50 or 100 round clips we get back rights to full body armor pepper spray tasers and walk on any campus or place as a right$#%&!@*courts and federal buildings
Likely? IS!
WE ARE ALLOWED TO CARRY AND WE WILL
“The Second Amendment to our Constitution is clear. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed upon”. It is there for the People’s protection, against an Overbearing Government ! Donald Trump supports this “Right”, as we all should ! Leave the 2nd. Amendment alone Liberals ! Is that clear ?
Banana finger broad.
LIKELY?!?!?!?! how about,, ABSOLUTELY Unconstitutional..