WAPO: Hillary “is going to be exonerated”, Judge Nap: “The evidence of her guilt is overwhelming”


Many of the pundits and experts disagree on the issue of Hillary Clinton’s innocence or guilt regarding the legality of her use of personal email and a private server during her tenure as secretary of state.  One area that people watching the case from both ends of the political spectrum have found  consensus, is that an indictment is no sure bet.

Liberal columnist Paul Waldman penned an op-ed in The Washington Post Friday claiming that Hillary Clinton will be exonerated of any wrongdoing in the email server scandal.

The latest news on the Hillary Clinton email controversy reinforces everything we’ve heard so far on this subject:

Prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server have so far found scant evidence that the leading Democratic presidential candidate intended to break classification rules, though they are still probing the case aggressively with an eye on interviewing Clinton herself, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

[…]

That point about her intending to break classification rules is important, because in order to have broken the law, it isn’t enough for Clinton to have had classified information in a place where it was possible for it to be hacked. She would have had to intentionally given classified information to someone without authorization to have it, like David Petraeus did when he showed classified documents to his mistress (and then lied to the FBI about it, by the way). Despite the enormous manpower and time the Justice Department has devoted to this case, there has never been even a suggestion, let alone any evidence, that Clinton did any such thing.

But when it comes to the presidential campaign, that isn’t going to matter. Republicans already know what they think: Hillary Clinton is a criminal whose every thought and action is vile and despicable, so of course she broke the law. If the investigation doesn’t show that, it could only be because the investigation was a sham. So they’ll just keep saying that this is a scandal, over and over and over.

Surprisingly, there seems to be an area of agreement between the Clinton-worshipping Waldman and Fox News’ Judge Andrew Napolitano: Hillary Clinton may very well be given a pass, and never be indicted by the FBI or Obama Justice Department.

“The evidence of her guilt is overwhelming,” Judge Napolitano stated. “And the FBI knows a lot more about it than I do.”

He said he is “100-percent certain” that the FBI has enough evidence to indict and convict.

Whether they do or not, however, is another issue and a politically-charged one, Judge Napolitano added.

Even though Judge Napolitano is 100% convinced of Hillary Clinton’s guilt, he still acknowledges that Crooked Hillary may waltz away from this and move into the White House instead of the big house.  Watch the video below for Napolitano’s take.

Bill’s conversation with Judge Napolitano begins around 14:30:

Sources:

Washington Post

Fox News Insider



Share

250 Comments

Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest